From: Crescent Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@moxa.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
FangpingFP.Cheng@moxa.com, Epson.Chiang@moxa.com,
EddieSY.Lin@moxa.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/14] serial: 8250: allow UART drivers to override rx_trig_bytes handling
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:52:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anFiFtp5vP0CtDVO@moxa-KabyLake-H> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcRkgsBOYWwk9pUxDvc4-YmSvVn0fkrhPSHHerwykVvWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 02, 2026 at 12:20:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 10:49 AM Crescent Hsieh
> <crescentcy.hsieh@moxa.com> wrote:
> >
> > The rx_trig_bytes sysfs attribute currently relies on 8250-internal
> > helper functions and assumes a fixed mapping between trigger levels and
> > FIFO behavior.
> >
> > Some UARTs provide hardware-specific RX trigger mechanisms that do not
> > fit this model. Add optional uart_port callbacks for setting and getting
> > the RX trigger level, and use them when provided, while preserving the
> > existing 8250 helpers as the default fallback.
>
> ...
>
> > struct tty_port *port = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + struct uart_state *state = container_of(port, struct uart_state, port);
> > + struct uart_port *uport = state->uart_port;
> > int rxtrig_bytes;
>
> Hmm... do_set_rxtrig() and do_get_rxtrig() do the same, but under the
> mutex lock. Hence there are questions:
> - is it correct to have without mutex?
> - if so, why not to propagate these (if you really need it), to the callees?
> - or should these callbacks be integrated in the lower level?
>
> > - rxtrig_bytes = do_serial8250_get_rxtrig(port);
> > + if (uport->get_rxtrig)
> > + rxtrig_bytes = uport->get_rxtrig(uport);
> > + else
> > + rxtrig_bytes = do_serial8250_get_rxtrig(port);
Yes, the callback path should be protected by the same mutex.
I agree that the callback dispatch should be moved into the lower-level
helpers rather than handled directly in rx_trig_bytes_show() and
rx_trig_bytes_store().
I also think the function names should be aligned with the naming
convention used by the other generic 8250 helpers for consistency.
So the resulting call flow would be like:
rx_trig_bytes_store/show()
|
v
serial8250_set/get_rxtrig()
|
+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| |
v v
uport->set/get_rxtrig() serial8250_do_set/get_rxtrig()
--
Thanks,
Crescent Hsieh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 7:48 [PATCH v5 00/14] serial: 8250: add Moxa MUEx50 PCIe board support Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] serial: 8250: split Moxa PCIe serial board support out of 8250_pci Crescent Hsieh
2026-08-02 8:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] serial: 8250: add Moxa MUEx50 UART port type Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: enable enhanced mode and program FIFO trigger levels Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: enable automatic RTS/CTS flow control Crescent Hsieh
2026-08-02 8:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: offload XON/XOFF flow control to MUEx50 hardware Crescent Hsieh
2026-08-02 9:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: add custom handle_irq callback Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: speed up RX using memory-mapped FIFO window Crescent Hsieh
2026-08-02 9:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: speed up TX " Crescent Hsieh
2026-08-02 9:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-03 4:46 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-08-03 7:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-03 7:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: support serial interface mode switching Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] serial: 8250: allow low-level drivers to override break control Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: add break support for RS485 using MUEx50 features Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] serial: 8250: allow UART drivers to override rx_trig_bytes handling Crescent Hsieh
2026-08-02 9:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-04 3:52 ` Crescent Hsieh [this message]
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: introduce per-port private data structure Crescent Hsieh
2026-07-31 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] serial: 8250_mxpcie: implement rx_trig_bytes callbacks via MUEx50 RTL Crescent Hsieh
2026-08-03 14:52 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] serial: 8250: add Moxa MUEx50 PCIe board support Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anFiFtp5vP0CtDVO@moxa-KabyLake-H \
--to=crescentcy.hsieh@moxa.com \
--cc=EddieSY.Lin@moxa.com \
--cc=Epson.Chiang@moxa.com \
--cc=FangpingFP.Cheng@moxa.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox