Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: imx: allow breaks to be received when using dma

[Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>]

On 10/20/2017 3:17 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> On 10/20/2017 3:13 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
>> This allows me to login after sending a break when service
>> serial-getty@ttymxc0.service is running
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
>> index 506fcd742b47..39033f460a24 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
>> @@ -934,7 +934,6 @@ static void dma_rx_callback(void *data)
>>  	status = dmaengine_tx_status(chan, (dma_cookie_t)0, &state);
>>  
>>  	if (status == DMA_ERROR) {
>> -		dev_err(sport->port.dev, "DMA transaction error.\n");
>>  		clear_rx_errors(sport);
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>> @@ -1035,6 +1034,7 @@ static int start_rx_dma(struct imx_port *sport)
>>  
>>  static void clear_rx_errors(struct imx_port *sport)
>>  {
>> +	struct tty_port *port = &sport->port.state->port;
>>  	unsigned int status_usr1, status_usr2;
>>  
>>  	status_usr1 = readl(sport->port.membase + USR1);
>> @@ -1043,12 +1043,18 @@ static void clear_rx_errors(struct imx_port *sport)
>>  	if (status_usr2 & USR2_BRCD) {
>>  		sport->port.icount.brk++;
>>  		writel(USR2_BRCD, sport->port.membase + USR2);
>> -	} else if (status_usr1 & USR1_FRAMERR) {
>> -		sport->port.icount.frame++;
>> -		writel(USR1_FRAMERR, sport->port.membase + USR1);
>> -	} else if (status_usr1 & USR1_PARITYERR) {
>> -		sport->port.icount.parity++;
>> -		writel(USR1_PARITYERR, sport->port.membase + USR1);
>> +		if (tty_insert_flip_char(port, 0, TTY_BREAK) == 0)
>> +			sport->port.icount.buf_overrun++;
>> +		tty_flip_buffer_push(port);
>> +	} else {
>> +		dev_err(sport->port.dev, "DMA transaction error.\n");
>> +		if (status_usr1 & USR1_FRAMERR) {
>> +			sport->port.icount.frame++;
>> +			writel(USR1_FRAMERR, sport->port.membase + USR1);
>> +		} else if (status_usr1 & USR1_PARITYERR) {
>> +			sport->port.icount.parity++;
>> +			writel(USR1_PARITYERR, sport->port.membase + USR1);
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (status_usr2 & USR2_ORE) {
>>
> 
> 
> 
> Does this need to use
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&sport->port.lock, flags);
> 
> 
> I would have, but dma_rx_callback doesn't.
> 
> BR
> Troy
> 
> 

I think the path is fine as is. Should I send a rebased version ?

Thanks
Troy