From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Edwards Subject: Re: Add new ASYNC_SPD_WARP13? Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20110406175350.64bd2f23@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20110406201457.1a5402ba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56398 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753888Ab1DFTVC (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:21:02 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7YHk-0003sC-FZ for linux-serial@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:21:00 +0200 Received: from dsl.comtrol.com ([64.122.56.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:21:00 +0200 Received: from grant.b.edwards by dsl.comtrol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:21:00 +0200 Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 2011-04-06, Alan Cox wrote: >> I could tell them to go the SPD_CUST route to get 921600, but I was >> hoping to provide an option that would support 921600 the same way >> that 57600, 230400, and 460800 are supported. > > And no doubt in time other speeds as well. > > ASYNC_SPD_xxx is legacy, it remains simply because we provided it as a > historic interface to some drivers and we don't want to break stuff > > So please use SPD_CUST if you must do this. I don't understand: what's the non-legacy alternative to using SPD_CUST? -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm having a at tax-deductible experience! gmail.com I need an energy crunch!!