From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Valerio Vanni" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: core: Preserve termios c_cflag for console resume Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 01:31:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7EC4C3FDEFF6492F91DEE16AEE0831E6@vanni.it> <1401891371-4946-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <1401891371-4946-2-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <20140604142232.GB1008@kroah.com> <538F3150.6040102@hurleysoftware.com> Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51687 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754675AbaFDXcH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:32:07 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsKf7-0000bs-Fz for linux-serial@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 01:32:05 +0200 Received: from 81-174-24-37.v4.ngi.it ([81.174.24.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 01:32:05 +0200 Received: from valerio by 81-174-24-37.v4.ngi.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 01:32:05 +0200 Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Peter Hurley" ha scritto nel messaggio news:538F3150.6040102@hurleysoftware.com > On 06/04/2014 10:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> Same as before, regression, or just a normal "new feature"? > > This was reported as a regression since 2.6.24, but that was likely > misreported, and more likely due to a userspace update which triggers > the bug. > > I would be surprised if console resume _never_ worked if the serial > tty was opened then closed, but it probably has worked for a long > time. I don't know what was my initial mistake, but I realized very soon it was not a regression and took away the "regression" flag from bugzilla. I tried many and many kernels and all were failing. I tried also to go down from 2.6.24 version, but I had to stop rather early because at some point the kernels were incompatible with distribution (I don't remember the details since I did these tests some month ago, and later I tested only newer kernel versions). The patches you sent are for -next? for -rc? for stable? Can I try them on 3.13.11? (at the moment I'm using this)