From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Matwey V. Kornilov" Subject: 9-bit mode Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:51:35 +0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34152 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934104AbaFRIvu (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 04:51:50 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WxBat-0001wo-3r for linux-serial@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:51:47 +0200 Received: from 158.250.29.172 ([158.250.29.172]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:51:47 +0200 Received: from matwey.kornilov by 158.250.29.172 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:51:47 +0200 Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Hi, Not sure, that it is a right place to ask. I would like to ask about status of 9-bit mode in the kernel. Some uart-devices support 9-bit mode. AFAIU the most challenging part is user-space termios api. I've found two patches in this list: http://marc.info/?l=linux-serial&m=125856076927911&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-serial&m=125856099128385&w=2 However, they are neither accepted nor commented. Is it because of wrong submission format?