From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: should RTS init in serial core be tied to CRTSCTS Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8bd0f97a0703011603m794e00f5x875eb68ad0db05de@mail.gmail.com> <200703061824.08834.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:58124 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965163AbXCGMqx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:46:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200703061824.08834.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> (Robin Getz's message of "Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:24:08 -0500") Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Robin Getz Cc: Mike Frysinger , rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Robin Getz writes: > It is useful on (broken) legacy serial equipment, where RTS should be > completely under the applications control. > > Glitches on RTS aren't acceptable, and confuse some devices. Does that mean you can't use TIOCMSET, TIOCM_RTS etc? > I understand - the request wasn't to change the default operation - just > add a > method of controlling things, so those minority of people who want the > control can have it. No problem as long as open without CRTSCTS raises RTS by default. -- Krzysztof Halasa