From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tim Douglas" <me@timdoug.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: pmac_zilog: report received breaks
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:44:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168837@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013013541.4535-3-me@timdoug.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] tty: serial: false break injection on NUL after Rx overrun
--
commit 009d6cf5b2db60250bcc44251e6de09814cc2746
Author: Tim Douglas <me@timdoug.com>
serial: pmac_zilog: report received breaks
This commit modifies pmz_receive_chars() to set the BRK_ABRT flag in r1
when processing the null character that ends a break. This allows breaks
to be properly counted and passed to BRKINT, PARMRK, and SysRq handlers,
matching the behavior of sunzilog.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/pmac_zilog.c b/drivers/tty/serial/pmac_zilog.c
> index f49d6052d11be..a612f1db9f189 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/pmac_zilog.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/pmac_zilog.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ static bool pmz_receive_chars(struct uart_pmac_port *uap)
> ch &= uap->parity_mask;
> if (ch == 0 && uap->flags & PMACZILOG_FLAG_BREAK) {
> uap->flags &= ~PMACZILOG_FLAG_BREAK;
> + r1 |= BRK_ABRT;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Does this code risk injecting a false Break event if an Rx FIFO overrun
occurs?
pmz_status_handle() sets PMACZILOG_FLAG_BREAK when it receives an EXT status
interrupt for a Break. Then pmz_receive_chars() waits for the associated NUL
character to clear the flag.
If an Rx FIFO overrun occurs and the hardware drops the expected NUL character,
the PMACZILOG_FLAG_BREAK flag will remain set indefinitely.
Since BRK_ABRT is now artificially injected into r1 when this flag is finally
cleared, could a subsequent, perfectly valid NUL character (such as Ctrl-@)
arriving much later falsely trigger a Break?
This might cause dropped data or trigger an unintended SysRq. Before this patch,
the stuck flag was harmless because it was cleared without altering r1.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013013541.4535-1-me@timdoug.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 1:35 [PATCH 0/2] serial: pmac_zilog: two receive fixes Tim Douglas
2026-10-13 1:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] serial: pmac_zilog: push received data to the port that received it Tim Douglas
2026-10-13 1:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 1:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] serial: pmac_zilog: report received breaks Tim Douglas
2026-10-13 1:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168837@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@timdoug.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox