From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Praveen Talari" <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] i2c: qcom-geni: Use geni_se_set_rate() for setting source clock frequency
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 13:24:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172926@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015-derive_clk_perf_tbl_from_perf_domain_opp_table-v3-8-5da1096243c9@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] i2c: qcom-geni: severe overhead from per-transfer ICC/OPP voting
- [Medium] i2c: qcom-geni: DMA channel leak on clk_map error path
- [Low] i2c: dead code in struct geni_i2c_desc after removing set_rate usage
--
commit 180f114c4a84db9299622afd7b4abba3adcdb2b5
Author: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: i2c: qcom-geni: Use geni_se_set_rate() for setting source clock frequency
This patch switches the GENI I2C driver to use geni_se_set_rate() instead of
platform-specific callbacks for source clock programming. It performs the
source clock configuration from qcom_geni_i2c_conf(), abstracting the
underlying resource management and unifying the code path across platforms.
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> index dbe344719b86c..4879170a12576 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1042,7 +1041,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = gi2c->dev_data->set_rate(&gi2c->se, gi2c->clk_freq_out);
> + ret = qcom_geni_i2c_conf(&gi2c->se);
> if (ret)
> goto out_pm;
>
[Severity: High]
Is there a significant performance regression from moving the interconnect
bandwidth vote and OPP setting into qcom_geni_i2c_conf()?
Because qcom_geni_i2c_conf() is now called unconditionally on every I2C
transaction via geni_i2c_xfer(), the interconnect and OPP frameworks are
invoked per transfer. This acquires global mutexes (like icc_bw_lock) and
recalculates hardware constraints, which could introduce massive overhead on
this hot path.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1345,7 +1344,6 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops geni_i2c_pm_ops = {
>
> static const struct geni_i2c_desc geni_i2c = {
> .resources_init = geni_se_resources_init,
> - .set_rate = qcom_geni_i2c_conf,
> .power_on = geni_se_resources_activate,
> .power_off = geni_se_resources_deactivate,
> };
> @@ -1354,14 +1352,12 @@ static const struct geni_i2c_desc i2c_master_hub = {
> .no_dma_support = true,
> .tx_fifo_depth = 16,
> .resources_init = geni_se_resources_init,
> - .set_rate = qcom_geni_i2c_conf,
> .power_on = geni_se_resources_activate,
> .power_off = geni_se_resources_deactivate,
> };
>
> static const struct geni_i2c_desc sa8255p_geni_i2c = {
> .resources_init = geni_se_domain_attach,
> - .set_rate = geni_se_set_perf_opp,
> };
[Severity: Low]
Is the set_rate function pointer now dead code?
The patch completely removes the initialization of .set_rate from all
geni_i2c_desc instances, but it leaves the function pointer inside
struct geni_i2c_desc:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c:geni_i2c_desc {
...
int (*resources_init)(struct geni_se *se);
int (*set_rate)(struct geni_se *se, unsigned long freq);
int (*power_on)(struct geni_se *se);
...
}
I also noticed a resource leak in geni_i2c_probe() that appears to have been
introduced earlier in this series when geni_i2c_clk_map_idx() was moved:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c:geni_i2c_probe() {
...
ret = geni_i2c_init(gi2c);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
ret = geni_i2c_clk_map_idx(gi2c);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(gi2c->se.dev, ret, "Invalid clk frequency %d Hz\n",
gi2c->clk_freq_out);
...
}
[Severity: Medium]
Are the GPI DMA channels leaked on this error path?
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but a previous commit in this
series moved geni_i2c_clk_map_idx() into geni_i2c_probe() after
geni_i2c_init().
geni_i2c_init() allocates GPI DMA channels via setup_gpi_dma() if FIFO is
disabled. If geni_i2c_clk_map_idx() then fails, the probe function returns
immediately without calling release_gpi_dma(), causing a leak of the
allocated channels.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015-derive_clk_perf_tbl_from_perf_domain_opp_table-v3-0-5da1096243c9@oss.qualcomm.com?part=8
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 12:58 [PATCH v3 0/8] soc: qcom: geni: Derive SE clock configuration from OPP table on SA8255P Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] soc: qcom: geni-se: Populate clk_perf_tbl with SE source clock frequencies from perf OPP table Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] soc: qcom: geni-se: Add helper to set SE clock rate via OPP Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] soc: qcom: geni-se: Remove OPP rate reset from resource deactivation Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] serial: qcom-geni: Use geni_se_set_rate() for source clock configuration Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] spi: qcom-geni: Use geni_se_set_rate() for setting source clock frequency Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] i2c: qcom-geni: Vote for SE clock rate using OPP Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] i2c: qcom-geni: Use common GENI resource initialization helper Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] i2c: qcom-geni: Use geni_se_set_rate() for setting source clock frequency Praveen Talari
2026-10-15 13:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172926@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox