From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhan Xusheng" <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: sysrq: reset the per-device key state when reparsing reset_seq
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:19:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-173915@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016070636.2559899-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] tty: sysrq: TOCTOU race in param_array parsing permanently truncates reset sequence
--
commit d416bc3fc7ebb943414eab9dc3be1f59ade9fcc6
Author: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
tty: sysrq: reset the per-device key state when reparsing reset_seq
sysrq_parse_reset_sequence() clears reset_seq_cnt, but reset_keybit is
only ever __set_bit() and reset_seq_len only ever incremented. Since
struct sysrq_state lives until the device goes away, both accumulate
every time the sequence is reparsed. This commit fixes this by clearing
both along with reset_seq_cnt and deleting the keyreset_timer when the
sequence is redefined.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> index c2e4b31b699aa..013ad3a500703 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> @@ -689,6 +689,15 @@ static void sysrq_parse_reset_sequence(struct sysrq_state *state)
> int i;
> unsigned short key;
>
> + /*
> + * An armed reset belongs to the sequence being replaced: once the
> + * old keys are gone from reset_keybit their release no longer
> + * cancels it.
> + */
> + timer_delete(&state->keyreset_timer);
> +
> + bitmap_zero(state->reset_keybit, KEY_CNT);
> + state->reset_seq_len = 0;
[Severity: Medium]
When a user writes a comma-separated list of keys to the module parameter,
param_array() updates the sequence elements sequentially:
kernel/params.c:param_array() {
...
*num = 0;
do {
...
ret = set(val, &kp);
...
(*num)++;
...
}
For each element, sysrq_reset_seq_param_set() increments the global
sysrq_reset_seq_version before param_array() increments the global length
sysrq_reset_seq_len (via *num).
If a hardware keypress triggers sysrq_filter() in the window after the
version is incremented but before the length is updated:
1. sysrq_handle_keypress() sees a version mismatch and calls
sysrq_parse_reset_sequence().
2. The newly added state->reset_seq_len = 0 clears the sequence length.
3. The loop reads the transient truncated sysrq_reset_seq_len.
4. state->reset_seq_version permanently caches the new version.
Once param_array() finishes and corrects sysrq_reset_seq_len, subsequent
keypresses will see matching versions and skip reparsing.
Could this cause a regression by permanently leaving the device with a
truncated reset sequence?
> state->reset_seq_cnt = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < sysrq_reset_seq_len; i++) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016070636.2559899-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 7:06 [PATCH v2] tty: sysrq: reset the per-device key state when reparsing reset_seq Zhan Xusheng
2026-10-16 7:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-173915@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox