From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "James Hilliard" <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] serial: 8250_dw: configure the Allwinner H616 UART
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 08:23:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-182506@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023-submit-h616-uart-fifo-v1-v1-2-e4a3bae2eba8@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] serial: 8250_dw: broken H616 RX DMA due to deferred sun6i_dma_issue_pending()
- [High] serial: 8250_dw: missing UART_CAP_AFE in UART_PORT_DW_APB_256 breaks CRTSCTS
--
commit 7b1955806965488d36d1ed6fbef81df345079c9d
Author: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
serial: 8250_dw: configure the Allwinner H616 UART
This patch adds a fixed 256-byte FIFO port configuration for the Allwinner
H616 UART, skips optional register probing, sets the SKIP_SET_RATE quirk, and
attaches 8250 DMA with single-byte burst sizes during probe.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> index eca02e8bd6d13..f03051740be0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -765,14 +780,21 @@ static int dw8250_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> dw8250_setup_dma_filter(p, data);
>
> - if (!data->skip_autocfg)
> - dw8250_setup_port(p);
> -
> - /* If we have a valid fifosize, try hooking up DMA */
> - if (p->fifosize) {
> - data->data.dma.rxconf.src_maxburst = p->fifosize / 4;
> - data->data.dma.txconf.dst_maxburst = p->fifosize / 4;
> + if (data->pdata && data->pdata->type) {
> + dw8250_setup_port_fixed(up, data->pdata->type);
> + data->data.dma.rxconf.src_maxburst = data->pdata->dma_maxburst;
> + data->data.dma.txconf.dst_maxburst = data->pdata->dma_maxburst;
> up->dma = &data->data.dma;
[Severity: High]
Will attaching the standard 8250 RX DMA path here work with the Allwinner
sun6i-dma controller, or does it cause RX DMA transfers to be immediately
aborted and leave RX DMA wedged?
When UART_IIR_RDI fires, serial8250_interrupt() loops in hardirq context:
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:serial8250_interrupt() {
l = i->head;
do {
struct uart_8250_port *up = list_entry(l, struct uart_8250_port, list);
struct uart_port *port = &up->port;
if (port->handle_irq(port)) {
handled = 1;
end = NULL;
} else if (end == NULL)
end = l;
...
} while (l != end);
}
On the first pass, dw8250_handle_irq() -> serial8250_handle_irq_locked() ->
handle_rx_dma() sees !up->dma->rx_running and breaks out to call
serial8250_rx_dma(), which sets dma->rx_running = 1 and calls
dma_async_issue_pending(dma->rxchan) without masking UART_IER_RDI or draining
the RX FIFO:
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:handle_rx_dma() {
switch (iir & 0x3f) {
case UART_IIR_RDI:
if (!up->dma->rx_running)
break;
fallthrough;
case UART_IIR_RLSI:
case UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT:
serial8250_rx_dma_flush(up);
return true;
}
return up->dma->rx_dma(up);
}
Unlike DMA controllers that start transfers synchronously in
device_issue_pending, sun6i_dma_issue_pending() defers physical channel
allocation and hardware transfer start to a softirq tasklet:
drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c:sun6i_dma_issue_pending() {
if (vchan_issue_pending(&vchan->vc)) {
spin_lock(&sdev->lock);
if (!vchan->phy && list_empty(&vchan->node)) {
list_add_tail(&vchan->node, &sdev->pending);
tasklet_schedule(&sdev->task);
...
}
spin_unlock(&sdev->lock);
}
}
Because serial8250_interrupt() is running in hardirq context, the tasklet
cannot run before serial8250_interrupt() immediately executes a second pass
on the port. Since no bytes have been read from the RX FIFO and UART_IER_RDI
is still enabled, UART_IIR still reports UART_IIR_RDI. On this second pass,
handle_rx_dma() sees up->dma->rx_running == 1 and calls
serial8250_rx_dma_flush(up), which pauses and terminates the DMA transfer that
was just queued.
Furthermore, inside serial8250_rx_dma_flush() -> __dma_rx_complete(),
sun6i_dma_tx_status() returns DMA_IN_PROGRESS even after dmaengine_pause(),
causing __dma_rx_complete() to return early without clearing dma->rx_running
or copying any received bytes before dmaengine_terminate_async() discards the
descriptor:
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dma.c:__dma_rx_complete() {
dma_status = dmaengine_tx_status(dma->rxchan, dma->rx_cookie, &state);
if (dma_status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS)
return;
}
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> index db066a42f61d2..e99d35880a689 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,14 @@ static const struct serial8250_config uart_config[] = {
> .rxtrig_bytes = {1, 4},
> .flags = UART_CAP_FIFO,
> },
> + [UART_PORT_DW_APB_256] = {
> + .name = "DW APB UART 256",
> + .fifo_size = 256,
> + .tx_loadsz = 256,
> + .fcr = UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_R_TRIG_01,
> + .rxtrig_bytes = {1, 64, 128, 254},
> + .flags = UART_CAP_FIFO | UART_CAP_NOTEMT,
> + },
[Severity: High]
Should uart_config[UART_PORT_DW_APB_256].flags also include UART_CAP_AFE?
In dw8250_probe(), dw8250_quirks() sets p->set_termios = dw8250_do_set_termios.
When CRTSCTS is enabled, dw8250_do_set_termios() unconditionally sets
UPSTAT_AUTOCTS, which tells serial_core to disable software CTS flow control:
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.c:dw8250_do_set_termios() {
p->status &= ~UPSTAT_AUTOCTS;
if (termios->c_cflag & CRTSCTS)
p->status |= UPSTAT_AUTOCTS;
serial8250_do_set_termios(p, termios, old);
}
However, serial8250_do_set_termios() -> serial8250_set_afe() only enables
hardware auto flow control (UART_MCR_AFE) if UART_CAP_AFE is set in
up->capabilities:
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:serial8250_set_afe() {
if (!(up->capabilities & UART_CAP_AFE))
return;
up->mcr &= ~UART_MCR_AFE;
if (termios->c_cflag & CRTSCTS)
up->mcr |= UART_MCR_AFE;
}
Because dw8250_setup_port_fixed() bypasses dw8250_setup_port(),
up->capabilities is populated solely from
uart_config[UART_PORT_DW_APB_256].flags. Without UART_CAP_AFE, enabling
CRTSCTS on H616 UARTs (such as Bluetooth HCI UARTs using uart-has-rtscts)
disables software CTS flow control without enabling hardware auto flow control
in UART_MCR.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261023-submit-h616-uart-fifo-v1-v1-0-e4a3bae2eba8@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 7:33 [PATCH 0/3] serial: 8250_dw: describe the Allwinner H616 UART configuration James Hilliard
2026-10-23 7:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: add Allwinner H616 James Hilliard
2026-10-23 7:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] serial: 8250_dw: configure the Allwinner H616 UART James Hilliard
2026-10-23 8:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-23 8:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-23 15:12 ` James Hilliard
2026-10-24 13:10 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-10-24 13:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-24 13:41 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-10-24 13:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-24 14:10 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-10-25 14:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-25 17:38 ` James Hilliard
2026-10-23 7:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: allwinner: h616: identify the UART integration James Hilliard
2026-10-23 8:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-182506@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox