From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: rip off the refcount from sgx_encl_add_page flow
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:43:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190619154341.GF1203@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190619122143.12028-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:21:43PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> With the file bound approach we can flush the work queue when the file
> is closed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/ioctl.c | 3 +--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/main.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/ioctl.c
> index d17c60dca114..f56d3c712dc4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/ioctl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/ioctl.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void sgx_add_page_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>
> next:
> kfree(req);
> - } while (!kref_put(&encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release) && !is_empty);
> + } while (!is_empty);
> }
>
> static u32 sgx_calc_ssaframesize(u32 miscselect, u64 xfrm)
> @@ -520,7 +520,6 @@ static int __sgx_encl_add_page(struct sgx_encl *encl,
> req->encl_page = encl_page;
> req->mrmask = mrmask;
> empty = list_empty(&encl->add_page_reqs);
> - kref_get(&encl->refcount);
> list_add_tail(&req->list, &encl->add_page_reqs);
> if (empty)
> queue_work(sgx_encl_wq, &encl->work);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/main.c
> index 0c831ee5e2de..9ea082372682 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/main.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/main.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static int sgx_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> struct sgx_encl *encl = file->private_data;
>
> + flush_work(&encl->work);
We should set SGX_ENCL_DEAD before flush_work(). Other than that I can't
think of any issues with this approach. Though hopefully we can purge the
worker altogether and make it a moot point :-).
> kref_put(&encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-19 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-19 12:21 [PATCH] x86/sgx: rip off the refcount from sgx_encl_add_page flow Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-19 15:43 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-06-20 19:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190619154341.GF1203@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox