linux-sgx.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>,
	Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for_v29 v2 1/5] x86/sgx: vdso: Make __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() callable from C code
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:04:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200330210426.GI1384380@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200330180811.31381-2-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:08:07AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Make __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() callable from C by preserving %rbx
> and taking @leaf in %rcx instead of %rax.  Being able to invoke the vDSO
> from C reduces the overhead of runtimes that are tightly coupled with
> their enclaves, e.g. that can rely on the enclave to save and restore
> non-volatile registers, as the runtime doesn't need an assembly wrapper
> to preserve non-volatile registers and/or shuffle stack arguments.
> 
> Note, both %rcx and %rbx are consumed by EENTER/ERESUME, i.e. consuming
> them doesn't violate the primary tenet of __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave()
> that "thou shalt not restrict how information is exchanged between an
> enclave and its host process".
> 
> Suggested-by: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S | 30 ++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> index 34cee2b0ef09..c56064fb36bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> @@ -17,22 +17,22 @@
>  
>  /**
>   * __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() - Enter an SGX enclave
> + * @rdi:	Pass-through value for RDI
> + * @rsi:	Pass-through value for RSI
> + * @rdx:	Pass-through value for RDX
>   * @leaf:	ENCLU leaf, must be EENTER or ERESUME
> + * @r8:		Pass-through value for R8
> + * @r9:		Pass-through value for R9
>   * @tcs:	TCS, must be non-NULL
>   * @e:		Optional struct sgx_enclave_exception instance
>   * @handler:	Optional enclave exit handler
>   *
> - * **Important!**  __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() is **NOT** compliant with the
> - * x86-64 ABI, i.e. cannot be called from standard C code.
> - *
> - * Input ABI:
> - *  @leaf	%eax
> - *  @tcs	8(%rsp)
> - *  @e 		0x10(%rsp)
> - *  @handler	0x18(%rsp)
> - *
> - * Output ABI:
> - *  @ret	%eax
> + * **Important!**  __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() does not ensure full compliance

I'd simply put **NOTE** here instead of **Important!** as it is more
common.

> + * with the x86-64 ABI, e.g. doesn't explicitly clear EFLAGS.DF after EEXIT.
> + * Except for non-volatile general purpose registers, preserving/setting state
> + * in accordance with the x86-64 ABI is the responsibility of the enclave and
> + * its runtime, i.e. __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() cannot be called from C code
> + * without careful consideration by both the enclave and its runtime.

Instead "e.g. doesn't explcitly clear EFLAGS.DF after EEXIT" (which is
somewhat confusing statement) paragraph should be replaced with a simple
enumerated list of differences.

Something might be left out but that's cool. Just do your best and it
can refined over time to be more exact.

>   *
>   * All general purpose registers except RAX, RBX and RCX are passed as-is to
>   * the enclave. RAX, RBX and RCX are consumed by EENTER and ERESUME and are
> @@ -71,7 +71,9 @@
>   */
>  #ifdef SGX_KERNEL_DOC
>  /* C-style function prototype to coerce kernel-doc into parsing the comment. */
> -int __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave(int leaf, void *tcs,
> +int __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave(unsigned long rdi, unsigned long rsi,
> +			     unsigned long rdx, unsigned int leaf,
> +			     unsigned long r8,  unsigned long r9, void *tcs,
>  			     struct sgx_enclave_exception *e,
>  			     sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t handler);
>  #endif
> @@ -83,7 +85,10 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
>  	.cfi_rel_offset		%rbp, 0
>  	mov	%rsp, %rbp
>  	.cfi_def_cfa_register	%rbp
> +	push	%rbx
> +	.cfi_rel_offset		%rbx, -8
>  
> +	mov	%ecx, %eax
>  .Lenter_enclave:
>  	/* EENTER <= leaf <= ERESUME */
>  	cmp	$EENTER, %eax
> @@ -109,6 +114,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
>  	jne	.Linvoke_userspace_handler
>  
>  .Lout:
> +	pop	%rbx
>  	leave
>  	.cfi_def_cfa		%rsp, 8
>  	ret
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-30 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-30 18:08 [PATCH for_v29 v2 0/5] x86/sgx: Make vDSO callable from C Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 18:08 ` [PATCH for_v29 v2 1/5] x86/sgx: vdso: Make __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() callable from C code Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 21:04   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-04-17 15:05     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-17 18:57       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-30 18:08 ` [PATCH for_v29 v2 2/5] x86/sgx: vdso: Define a typedef for __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 21:10   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-30 18:08 ` [PATCH for_v29 v2 3/5] selftests/sgx: Pass EENTER to vDSO wrapper instead of hardcoding Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 21:07   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-30 21:11     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-30 18:08 ` [PATCH for_v29 v2 4/5] selftests/sgx: Stop clobbering non-volatile registers Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 18:08 ` [PATCH for_v29 v2 5/5] selftests/sgx: Add selftest to invoke __vsgx_enter_enclave() from C Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 20:48 ` [PATCH for_v29 v2 0/5] x86/sgx: Make vDSO callable " Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-30 21:42   ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-31 11:58     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-31 13:40       ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-04-01  8:17         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-04-01 13:06           ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-04-01 14:49             ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 20:01               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-04-02 19:49             ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200330210426.GI1384380@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).