From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F59DC433DF for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31F722276 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="bOIH3nBN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726669AbgJSMjr (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:39:47 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:52750 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726336AbgJSMjr (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:39:47 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f07840035f820c6b6854d62.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f07:8400:35f8:20c6:b685:4d62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id E824B1EC0494; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:39:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1603111186; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=Ap1Rc76hWxQheV4kamlLkzjVJEhQ2FA71JYULFMFfck=; b=bOIH3nBNi6Ro34Rwc9tx6498/XMGzfgSK32m1NyK/0BVl4g+lpcTnOThevGvIPbPXcSGMa A+1H3eWRtIaIFpWB/GuobNRnI4Zrr1infNALqazBlvxUTdfvuOO5t0RyiJETcIPnun5j4J S7+wLYx+LcNQVzPMel1y48h5Mabfc/Q= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:39:34 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , Jethro Beekman , Darren Kenny , Serge Ayoun , akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com, cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com, mikko.ylinen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v39 08/24] x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) sections Message-ID: <20201019123934.GA24325@zn.tnic> References: <20201003045059.665934-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20201003045059.665934-9-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20201019084558.GA1155569@kapsi.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201019084558.GA1155569@kapsi.fi> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:45:58AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 07:50:43AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > +config INTEL_SGX > > Since the directory for this was renamed some iterations ago from > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx to intel_sgx given the feedback from Boris, > I'm wondering should this also be renamed as X86_SGX? I don't think it matters. I hardly doubt there will be anything else "SGX" besides the Intel one... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette