public inbox for linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nathaniel McCallum <nathaniel@profian.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org (open list:KERNEL SELFTEST
	FRAMEWORK), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2.1 27/30] selftests/sgx: Test invalid access to removed enclave page
Date: Fri,  4 Mar 2022 11:35:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304093524.397485-27-jarkko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220304093524.397485-1-jarkko@kernel.org>

From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Removing a page from an initialized enclave involves three steps:
(1) the user requests changing the page type to SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM
via the SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE  ioctl(), (2) on success the
ENCLU[EACCEPT] instruction is run from within the enclave to accept
the page removal, (3) the user initiates the actual removal of the
page via the SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_REMOVE_PAGES ioctl().

Test two possible invalid accesses during the page removal flow:
* Test the behavior when a request to remove the page by changing its
  type to SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM completes successfully but instead of
  executing ENCLU[EACCEPT] from within the enclave the enclave attempts
  to read from the page. Even though the page is accessible from the
  page table entries its type is SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM and thus not
  accessible according to SGX. The expected behavior is a page fault
  with the SGX flag set in the error code.
* Test the behavior when the page type is changed successfully and
  ENCLU[EACCEPT] was run from within the enclave. The final ioctl(),
  SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_REMOVE_PAGES, is omitted and replaced with an
  attempt to access the page. Even though the page is accessible
  from the page table entries its type is SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM and
  thus not accessible according to SGX.  The expected behavior is
  a page fault with the SGX flag set in the error code.

Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 247 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
index 82902dab96bc..d132e7d32454 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
@@ -1569,4 +1569,251 @@ TEST_F(enclave, remove_added_page_no_eaccept)
 	EXPECT_EQ(remove_ioc.count, 0);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Request enclave page removal but instead of correctly following with
+ * EACCEPT a read attempt to page is made from within the enclave.
+ */
+TEST_F(enclave, remove_added_page_invalid_access)
+{
+	struct encl_op_get_from_addr get_addr_op;
+	struct encl_op_put_to_addr put_addr_op;
+	struct sgx_enclave_modt ioc;
+	struct sgx_secinfo secinfo;
+	unsigned long data_start;
+	int ret, errno_save;
+
+	ASSERT_TRUE(setup_test_encl(ENCL_HEAP_SIZE_DEFAULT, &self->encl, _metadata));
+
+	memset(&self->run, 0, sizeof(self->run));
+	self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base;
+
+	/*
+	 * Hardware (SGX2) and kernel support is needed for this test. Start
+	 * with check that test has a chance of succeeding.
+	 */
+	memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc));
+	ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc);
+
+	if (ret == -1) {
+		if (errno == ENOTTY)
+			SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE ioctl()");
+		else if (errno == ENODEV)
+			SKIP(return, "System does not support SGX2");
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Invalid parameters were provided during sanity check,
+	 * expect command to fail.
+	 */
+	EXPECT_EQ(ret, -1);
+
+	/*
+	 * Page that will be removed is the second data page in the .data
+	 * segment. This forms part of the local encl_buffer within the
+	 * enclave.
+	 */
+	data_start = self->encl.encl_base +
+		     encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE;
+
+	/*
+	 * Sanity check that page at @data_start is writable before
+	 * removing it.
+	 *
+	 * Start by writing MAGIC to test page.
+	 */
+	put_addr_op.value = MAGIC;
+	put_addr_op.addr = data_start;
+	put_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_PUT_TO_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&put_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Read memory that was just written to, confirming that data
+	 * previously written (MAGIC) is present.
+	 */
+	get_addr_op.value = 0;
+	get_addr_op.addr = data_start;
+	get_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_GET_FROM_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(get_addr_op.value, MAGIC);
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	/* Start page removal by requesting change of page type to PT_TRIM. */
+	memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc));
+	memset(&secinfo, 0, sizeof(secinfo));
+
+	secinfo.flags = SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM << 8;
+	ioc.offset = encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE;
+	ioc.length = PAGE_SIZE;
+	ioc.secinfo = (unsigned long)&secinfo;
+
+	ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc);
+	errno_save = ret == -1 ? errno : 0;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(errno_save, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(ioc.result, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(ioc.count, 4096);
+
+	/*
+	 * Read from page that was just removed.
+	 */
+	get_addr_op.value = 0;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * From kernel perspective the page is present but according to SGX the
+	 * page should not be accessible so a #PF with SGX bit set is
+	 * expected.
+	 */
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.function, ERESUME);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 14);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0x8005);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, data_start);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Request enclave page removal and correctly follow with
+ * EACCEPT but do not follow with removal ioctl() but instead a read attempt
+ * to removed page is made from within the enclave.
+ */
+TEST_F(enclave, remove_added_page_invalid_access_after_eaccept)
+{
+	struct encl_op_get_from_addr get_addr_op;
+	struct encl_op_put_to_addr put_addr_op;
+	struct encl_op_eaccept eaccept_op;
+	struct sgx_enclave_modt ioc;
+	struct sgx_secinfo secinfo;
+	unsigned long data_start;
+	int ret, errno_save;
+
+	ASSERT_TRUE(setup_test_encl(ENCL_HEAP_SIZE_DEFAULT, &self->encl, _metadata));
+
+	memset(&self->run, 0, sizeof(self->run));
+	self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base;
+
+	/*
+	 * Hardware (SGX2) and kernel support is needed for this test. Start
+	 * with check that test has a chance of succeeding.
+	 */
+	memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc));
+	ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc);
+
+	if (ret == -1) {
+		if (errno == ENOTTY)
+			SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE ioctl()");
+		else if (errno == ENODEV)
+			SKIP(return, "System does not support SGX2");
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Invalid parameters were provided during sanity check,
+	 * expect command to fail.
+	 */
+	EXPECT_EQ(ret, -1);
+
+	/*
+	 * Page that will be removed is the second data page in the .data
+	 * segment. This forms part of the local encl_buffer within the
+	 * enclave.
+	 */
+	data_start = self->encl.encl_base +
+		     encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE;
+
+	/*
+	 * Sanity check that page at @data_start is writable before
+	 * removing it.
+	 *
+	 * Start by writing MAGIC to test page.
+	 */
+	put_addr_op.value = MAGIC;
+	put_addr_op.addr = data_start;
+	put_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_PUT_TO_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&put_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Read memory that was just written to, confirming that data
+	 * previously written (MAGIC) is present.
+	 */
+	get_addr_op.value = 0;
+	get_addr_op.addr = data_start;
+	get_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_GET_FROM_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(get_addr_op.value, MAGIC);
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	/* Start page removal by requesting change of page type to PT_TRIM. */
+	memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc));
+	memset(&secinfo, 0, sizeof(secinfo));
+
+	secinfo.flags = SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM << 8;
+	ioc.offset = encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE;
+	ioc.length = PAGE_SIZE;
+	ioc.secinfo = (unsigned long)&secinfo;
+
+	ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc);
+	errno_save = ret == -1 ? errno : 0;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(errno_save, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(ioc.result, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(ioc.count, 4096);
+
+	eaccept_op.epc_addr = (unsigned long)data_start;
+	eaccept_op.ret = 0;
+	eaccept_op.flags = SGX_SECINFO_TRIM | SGX_SECINFO_MODIFIED;
+	eaccept_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_EACCEPT;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&eaccept_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(eaccept_op.ret, 0);
+
+	/* Skip ioctl() to remove page. */
+
+	/*
+	 * Read from page that was just removed.
+	 */
+	get_addr_op.value = 0;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * From kernel perspective the page is present but according to SGX the
+	 * page should not be accessible so a #PF with SGX bit set is
+	 * expected.
+	 */
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.function, ERESUME);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 14);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0x8005);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, data_start);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-04  9:34 [RFC PATCH v2.1 01/30] x86/sgx: Add short descriptions to ENCLS wrappers Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 02/30] x86/sgx: Add wrapper for SGX2 EMODPR function Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 03/30] x86/sgx: Add wrapper for SGX2 EMODT function Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 04/30] x86/sgx: Add wrapper for SGX2 EAUG function Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 05/30] Documentation/x86: Document SGX permission details Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 06/30] x86/sgx: Support VMA permissions more relaxed than enclave permissions Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 07/30] x86/sgx: Add pfn_mkwrite() handler for present PTEs Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 08/30] x86/sgx: Export sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 09/30] x86/sgx: Rename sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() as sgx_encl_cpumask() Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 10/30] x86/sgx: Move PTE zap code to new sgx_zap_enclave_ptes() Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 11/30] x86/sgx: Make sgx_ipi_cb() available internally Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 12/30] x86/sgx: Create utility to validate user provided offset and length Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 13/30] x86/sgx: Keep record of SGX page type Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 14/30] x86/sgx: Support restricting of enclave page permissions Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09  8:52   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09  9:35     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09 16:59       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-09 19:10         ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-09 23:35         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09 23:42           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-10  0:11             ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-10  0:10           ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-10  2:02             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 15/30] selftests/sgx: Add test for EPCM permission changes Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 16/30] selftests/sgx: Add test for TCS page " Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 17/30] x86/sgx: Support adding of pages to an initialized enclave Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 18/30] x86/sgx: Tighten accessible memory range after enclave initialization Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 19/30] selftests/sgx: Test two different SGX2 EAUG flows Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 20/30] x86/sgx: Support modifying SGX page type Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 21/30] x86/sgx: Support complete page removal Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 22/30] Documentation/x86: Introduce enclave runtime management section Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 23/30] selftests/sgx: Introduce dynamic entry point Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 24/30] selftests/sgx: Introduce TCS initialization enclave operation Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 25/30] selftests/sgx: Test complete changing of page type flow Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 26/30] selftests/sgx: Test faulty enclave behavior Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 28/30] selftests/sgx: Test reclaiming of untouched page Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 29/30] x86/sgx: Free up EPC pages directly to support large page ranges Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 30/30] selftests/sgx: Page removal stress test Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 01/30] x86/sgx: Add short descriptions to ENCLS wrappers Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:41   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-14 19:04 ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220304093524.397485-27-jarkko@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathaniel@profian.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox