From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B10C28D13 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242785AbiHYPoX (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:44:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237660AbiHYPoW (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:44:22 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7B5A895C; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:44:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661442261; x=1692978261; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mD/SXcX1eKcumkkkppJMFFQVef9qXaiaDolZPsdaysM=; b=fzrgzys6E0Drksen76pwRlpQH51wRmVx6H39wn45Qa22laWy3Dp/YcrH X235qS3zrziZ6vgQobJdE45F0EjfRJWz2jM0TKlJsj2A4g6dyDUCHOe+Q ZzJSjS3la4ZLDrFOIEQts9W8dkxHJhxs9ooIfsvjkn8gm79gNGiT4auOF YHDnwal67AjDWFjczvVzL8JN4Z+k/Qsr48KkrxP3GhD8HjHGE72z/T+x6 +jXCnMt9LmyVODAY8J0VpAqAovoQoqaKOdpO1dl4Et9Kl3Ngykiku6mrU jRsygsLf37Rr7QnLMJ4PGSZb2jBeBd5jlOPyDAbv0u1HCGEtnQMpvNgiG A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10450"; a="295551020" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,263,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="295551020" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2022 08:44:21 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,263,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="752529341" Received: from manjeets-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.220.1]) ([10.212.220.1]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2022 08:44:20 -0700 Message-ID: <236e5130-ec29-e99d-a368-3323a5f6f741@intel.com> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:44:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Allow exposing EDECCSSA user leaf function to KVM guest Content-Language: en-US To: Sean Christopherson , Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Kai Huang , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, haitao.huang@linux.intel.com References: <20220818023829.1250080-1-kai.huang@intel.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On 8/25/22 08:19, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> This patch, along with your patch to expose AEX-notify attribute bit to >>> guest, have been tested that both AEX-notify and EDECCSSA work in the VM. >>> Feel free to merge this patch. > Dave, any objection to taking this through the KVM tree? This specific patch? Or are you talking about the couple of AEX-notify patches in their entirety?