From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, jarkko@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, yang.zhong@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: sgx_vepc: extract sgx_vepc_remove_page
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:14:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34632ea9-42d3-fdfa-ae47-e208751ab090@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06db5a41-3485-9141-10b5-56ca57ed1792@intel.com>
On 13/09/21 16:55, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> By "Windows startup" I mean even after guest reboot. Because another
>> process could sneak in and steal your EPC pages between a close() and an
>> open(), I'd like to have a way to EREMOVE the pages while keeping them
>> assigned to the specific vEPC instance, i.e.*without* going through
>> sgx_vepc_free_page().
> Oh, so you want fresh EPC state for the guest, but you're concerned that
> the previous guest might have left them in a bad state. The current
> method of getting a new vepc instance (which guarantees fresh state) has
> some other downsides.
>
> Can't another process steal pages via sgxd and reclaim at any time?
vEPC pages never call sgx_mark_page_reclaimable, don't they?
> What's the extra concern here about going through a close()/open()
> cycle? Performance?
Apart from reclaiming, /dev/sgx_vepc might disappear between the first
open() and subsequent ones.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-13 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-13 13:11 [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/2] x86: sgx_vepc: implement ioctl to EREMOVE all pages Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-13 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: sgx_vepc: extract sgx_vepc_remove_page Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-13 14:05 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-13 14:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-13 14:55 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-13 15:14 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-09-13 15:29 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-13 18:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-13 19:25 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-13 21:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-13 21:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-13 21:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-14 5:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 16:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-13 21:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-13 21:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-13 20:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-13 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: sgx_vepc: implement SGX_IOC_VEPC_REMOVE ioctl Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-13 19:33 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-13 21:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-13 22:43 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-14 10:55 ` Kai Huang
2021-09-14 7:10 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/2] x86: sgx_vepc: implement ioctl to EREMOVE all pages Yang Zhong
2021-09-14 10:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 16:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-14 17:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 17:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-14 17:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-15 8:28 ` Yang Zhong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-20 12:53 [PATCH " Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-20 12:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: sgx_vepc: extract sgx_vepc_remove_page Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21 19:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-21 19:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-23 12:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-23 20:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34632ea9-42d3-fdfa-ae47-e208751ab090@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox