Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] x86/sgx: fine grained SGX MCA behavior

[Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 15:02 +0800, Zhiquan Li wrote:
> On 2022/6/7 14:35, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Considering Zhiquan's series: all the patches have different message ID,
> > which puts them into different threads and makes it hard to apply.
> > 
> > E.g.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20220525100625.760633-1-zhiquan1.li@intel.com/T/#u
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20220525100730.760815-1-zhiquan1.li@intel.com/T/#u
> > 
> > Zhiquan: can you send your patch series as a single series? Easiest
> > way to do it is to use git send-email. Right now the series broken.
> 
> Thanks for the heads up.
> 
> I was not aware of the patch series are broken on https://lore.kernel.org/.
> I do use git send-email, there must be some settings are wrong,
> let me check my git config.
> Sorry for the inconvenience.

No worries, just look at the main page at lore for sgx, and you
see immediately the issue :-) 

One more thing.

I think Tony hinted me about mechanism to test MCA behaviour in
kernel but I cannot recall it anymore. Was there a way to make
to simulate a memory failure, and use that to test the patch
set?


> Best Regards,
> Zhiquan

BR, Jarkko