From: "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v3 06/10] x86/sgx: Forced EPC page zapping for EUPDATESVN
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 04:21:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c9eb8264f4b4d77a8ede5e17a0e0d0c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ykl0+Da6t7z9VSuA@kernel.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2022 6:21 PM
> To: Zhang, Cathy <cathy.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; Chatre, Reinette
> <reinette.chatre@intel.com>; Hansen, Dave <dave.hansen@intel.com>; Raj,
> Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 06/10] x86/sgx: Forced EPC page zapping for
> EUPDATESVN
>
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:24:05PM +0800, Cathy Zhang wrote:
> > Before an EUPDATESVN instruction can be successful, all enclave pages
> > (EPC) must be marked as unused in the SGX hardware metadata (EPCM).
> >
> > A page becomes unused when an issued EREMOVE instruction succeeds.
> > To prepare for EUPDATESVN, loop over all SGX pages and attempt to
> > EREMOVE them. This is fatal to running enclaves and destroys all
> > enclave state and memory contents. This destruction is by design and
> > mitigates any compromise of enclaves or the SGX hardware itself which
> > occurred before the microcode update.
> >
> > An EREMOVE operation on a page may fail for a few reasons. Each has
> > its own mitigations.
> >
> > First, EREMOVE will fail if an enclave that uses the page is
> > executing. Send an IPI to all CPUs that might be running the enclave
> > to force it out of the enclave long enough to EREMOVE the page. Other
> > CPUs might enter the enclave in the meantime, so this is not a
> > rock-solid guarantee.
> >
> > Second, EREMOVE can fail on special SGX metadata pages, such as SECS
> > and VA. EREMOVE will work on them only after the normal SGX
>
> Ignoring concurrency rules that apply to any type of EPC page, VA page can
> be removed at any point of time, i.e. the first sentence in this paragraph is
> not factually true.
Yes, the SGX metadata pages failed to be EREMOVEd and be tracked for a later
retry is SECS pages.
Removed "VA" from the sentence Jarkko mentioned, Thanks for pointing out!
>
> BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 14:23 [RFC PATCH v3 00/10] Support microcode updates affecting SGX Cathy Zhang
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/10] x86/sgx: Introduce mechanism to prevent new initializations of EPC pages Cathy Zhang
2022-04-03 8:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-06 3:31 ` Zhang, Cathy
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/10] x86/sgx: Provide VA page non-NULL owner Cathy Zhang
2022-04-03 8:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/10] x86/sgx: Save enclave pointer for VA page Cathy Zhang
2022-04-03 10:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-06 3:31 ` Zhang, Cathy
2022-04-06 6:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/10] x86/sgx: Keep record for SGX VA and Guest page type Cathy Zhang
2022-04-03 10:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-06 3:38 ` Zhang, Cathy
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/10] x86/sgx: Save the size of each EPC section Cathy Zhang
2022-04-03 10:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-06 4:00 ` Zhang, Cathy
2022-04-06 6:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/10] x86/sgx: Forced EPC page zapping for EUPDATESVN Cathy Zhang
2022-04-03 10:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-06 4:21 ` Zhang, Cathy [this message]
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/10] x86/sgx: Define error codes for ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] Cathy Zhang
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/10] x86/sgx: Implement ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] Cathy Zhang
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/10] x86/cpu: Call ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] procedure in microcode update Cathy Zhang
2022-04-01 14:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-02 2:54 ` Zhang, Cathy
2022-04-01 15:42 ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-02 3:02 ` Zhang, Cathy
2022-04-01 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/10] x86/sgx: Call ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] during SGX initialization Cathy Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c9eb8264f4b4d77a8ede5e17a0e0d0c@intel.com \
--to=cathy.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox