Re: [PATCH 4/6] selftests/sgx: Add SGX selftest augment_via_eaccept_long

[Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

Hi Jarkko,

On 8/30/2022 7:28 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 03:55:47PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 8/29/2022 8:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> From: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Add a new test case which is same as augment_via_eaccept but adds a
>>> larger number of EPC pages to stress test EAUG via EACCEPT.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@intel.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - Addressed Reinette's feedback:
>>>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/24bd8e42-ff4e-0090-d9e1-cd81e4807f21@intel.com/
>>> ---
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c      |   5 +-
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c      | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.h      |   3 +-
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/sgx/sigstruct.c |   2 +-
>>>  4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> There seems to be at least three patches merged into one here:
>> 1) Update SGX selftests to create enclaves with provided size dedicated
>>    to EDMM (this change causes a lot of noise and distracts from the test
>>    addition).
>> 2) The mrenclave_ecreate() fix (which is still incomplete).
>> 3) The actual test addition.
> 
> I would agree on this on a kernel patch but not for kselftest patch. It
> does not really give useful value here. This adds a test and that is a
> good enough granularity in my opinion, unless some major architecture
> work is required as precursory. It is not the case here.

I must say that for many good reasons this goes against one of the
fundamental rules of kernel patches: separate logical changes into
separate patches. This is your domain though so of course the work
within it follows your guidance and I will not pursue it further.

> 
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c
>>> index 94bdeac1cf04..7de1b15c90b1 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c
>>> @@ -171,7 +171,8 @@ uint64_t encl_get_entry(struct encl *encl, const char *symbol)
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -bool encl_load(const char *path, struct encl *encl, unsigned long heap_size)
>>> +bool encl_load(const char *path, struct encl *encl, unsigned long heap_size,
>>> +			   unsigned long edmm_size)
>>>  {
>>
>> checkpatch.pl informs about alignment issues above and also a few other places.
> 
> Weird. I did run checkpatch through these. Will revisit.

I usually run checkpatch.pl with "--strict".

Reinette