From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/2] x86/sgx: Add an attribute for the amount of SGX memory in a NUMA node
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:10:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbCEl9kqhTz2iOY2@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f25d95e6-e129-597b-5d93-d7264feae8b8@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 11:36:50AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/16/21 8:21 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > The amount of SGX memory on the system is determined by the BIOS and it
> > varies wildly between systems. It can be from dozens of MB's on desktops
> > or VM's, up to many GB's on servers. Just like for regular memory, it is
> > sometimes useful to know the amount of usable SGX memory in the system.
> >
> > Introduce CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODE_DEV_GROUP opt-in flag to expose an arch
> > specific attribute group, and add an attribute for the amount of SGX
> > memory in bytes to each NUMA node:
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/x86/sgx_total_bytes
>
> There's some context missing here:
I'll say. "it is sometimes useful" is not the proper argumentation for
adding new stuff.
> This serves the same function for SGX memory as /proc/meminfo or
> /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/meminfo does for normal RAM. It
> enumerates how much physical SGX memory is present so that you can size
> enclaves on different systems.
>
> This specific file (sgx_total_bytes) is needed today to help drive the
> SGX selftests. The SGX selftests need to create overcommitted enclaves
> which are larger than the physical SGX memory on the system. They
> currently use a CPUID-based approach which can diverge from the actual
> amount of SGX memory available. This file ensures that the selftests
> can work efficiently and do not attempt stupid things like creating a
> 100,000 MB enclave on a system with 128 MB of SGX memory.
Thanks, that's exactly what I was missing. Please stick that explanation
somewhere prominent.
> The nodeX/x86 directory is used because SGX is highly x86-specific.
> It's very unlikely that any other architecture (or even non-Intel x86
> vendor) will ever implement SGX. It needs its own directory (as opposed
> to being in the nodeX/ "root") because this is expected to be the first
> of a few different things that need to get exported. This avoids
> cluttering the root with several "sgx_*" files.
>
> How many of these files will there be? Just scanning /proc/meminfo,
> these are the no-brainers that we have for RAM, but we need for SGX:
>
> MemTotal: xxxx kB // sgx_total_bytes (this patch)
> MemFree: yyyy kB // sgx_free_bytes
> SwapTotal: zzzz kB // sgx_swapped_bytes
>
> So, at *least* three. I think we will eventually end up needing
> something more along the lines of a dozen.
Oh well, I guess.
I was going to propose to make that
...nodeX/sgx/
but having it be arch-specific would mean that theoretically we could
add some non-sgx files there too, in the future, and if/when needed.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 16:21 [PATCH v13 1/2] x86/sgx: Rename fallback labels in sgx_init() Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-11-16 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 2/2] x86/sgx: Add an attribute for the amount of SGX memory in a NUMA node Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-12-04 23:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-12-07 19:36 ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-08 10:10 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-12-08 19:38 ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-09 12:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-11 15:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-12-11 15:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-12-17 19:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-12-17 21:17 ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-17 22:04 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-12-28 23:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-01-02 4:54 ` Dave Hansen
2022-01-02 23:20 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-01-04 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2022-01-06 19:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-01-07 11:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbCEl9kqhTz2iOY2@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox