public inbox for linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/sgx: Add accounting for tracking overcommit
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 17:54:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ydmzz6izGpM+dZv3@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c697809f70cf8d5f7ac973459672f6867f56815.camel@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 09:17:03AM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-07 at 14:25 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:26:18AM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Jarkko, thanks for your review,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 01:04 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:46:39AM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * sgx_charge_mem() - charge for a page used for backing
> > > > > storage
> > > > > + *
> > > > 
> > > > Please remove this empty line:
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
> > > 
> > > I read this to be that there should be an empty line after the
> > > short
> > > description/arg list but before the longer description. I think for
> > > functions without args this is the proper layout. It also is more
> > > readable.
> > > 
> > > > > + * Backing storage usage is capped by the
> > > > > sgx_nr_available_backing_pages.
> > > > > + * If the backing storage usage is over the overcommit limit,
> > > > 
> > > > Where does this verb "charge" come from?
> > > 
> > > Charge in this context means that some available backing pages are
> > > now
> > > not available because they are in use. It feels appropriate to me
> > > to
> > > use "charge/uncharge" verbs for this action, unless you think it's
> > > confusing somehow.
> > 
> > OK, it's cool.
> > 
> > I'm still wondering why you need extra variable given that
> > sgx_nr_backing_available_pages is signed. You could mark the
> > feature being disabled by setting it to -1.
> > 
> > It might cosmetically improve readability to have a boolean but
> > for practical uses (e.g. eBPF tracing scripts) it only adds extra
> > complexity.
> > 
> > /Jarkko
> 
> I can see your point. Since Boris objected to the module param, the
> next version will not have a way to disable limits at all, so I am
> deleting that boolean all together.

Ok, cool, I'm looking forward for the next version.

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-08 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-20 17:46 [PATCH 0/2] x86/sgx: Limit EPC overcommit Kristen Carlson Accardi
2021-12-20 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/sgx: Add accounting for tracking overcommit Kristen Carlson Accardi
2021-12-20 19:30   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-20 20:39     ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2021-12-20 21:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-20 21:35         ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2021-12-20 22:48           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-21 15:53             ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-22 14:21           ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-28 23:04   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-12-28 23:34     ` Dave Hansen
2022-01-06 18:26     ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2022-01-07 12:25       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-01-07 17:17         ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2022-01-08 15:54           ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-12-20 17:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/sgx: account backing pages Kristen Carlson Accardi
2021-12-28 23:37   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-01-05  0:36     ` Dave Hansen
2022-01-08 14:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ydmzz6izGpM+dZv3@iki.fi \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox