public inbox for linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	haitao.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] SGX shmem backing store issue
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 20:48:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ynaw2A0z6mBLU0m4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ynavabraw26HwnfW@kernel.org>

On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 08:46:50PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 02:33:06PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 5/2/22 10:11, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > > My goal was to prevent the page fault handler from doing a "is the PCMD
> > > page empty" if the reclaimer has a reference to it. Even if the PCMD page
> > > is empty when the page fault handler checks it the page is expected to
> > > get data right when reclaimer can get the mutex back since the reclaimer
> > > already has a reference to the page.
> > 
> > I think shmem_truncate_range() might be the wrong operation.  It
> > destroys data and, in the end, we don't want to destroy data.
> > Filesystems and the page cache already have nice ways to keep from
> > destroying data, we just need to use them.
> > 
> > First, I think set_page_dirty(pcmd_page) before the EWB is a good start.
> >  That's what filesystems do before important data that needs to be saved
> > goes into pages.
> > 
> > Second, I think we need behavior like POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED, not
> > FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE.  The DONTNEED operations end up in
> > mapping_evict_folio(), which has both page refcount *and* dirty page
> > checks.  That means that either elevating a refcount or set_page_dirty()
> > will thwart DONTNEED-like behavior.
> > 
> > There are two basic things we need to do:
> > 
> > 1. Prevent page from being truncated around EWB time
> > 2. Prevent unreferenced page with all zeros from staying in shmem
> >    forever or taking up swap space
> > 
> > On the EWB (write to PCMD side) I think something like this works:
> > 
> > 	sgx_encl_get_backing()
> > 		get_page(pcmd_page)
> > 
> > 	...
> > 	lock_page(pcmd_page);
> > 	// check for truncation since sgx_encl_get_backing()
> > 	if (pcmd_page->mapping != shmem)
> > 		goto retry;
> > 	 // double check this is OK under lock_page():
> > 	set_page_dirty(pcmd_page);
> > 	__sgx_encl_ewb();
> > 	unlock_page(pcmd_page);
> > 
> > That's basically what filesystems do.  Get the page from the page cache,
> > lock it, then make sure it is consistent.  If not, retry.
> > 
> > On the "free" / read in (ELDU) side:
> > 
> > 	// get pcmd_page ref
> > 	lock_page(pcmd_page);
> > 	// truncation is not a concern because that's only done
> > 	// on the read-in side, here, where we hold encl->lock
> > 
> > 	memset();
> > 	if (!memchr_inv())
> > 		// clear the way for DONTNEED:
> > 		ClearPageDirty(pcmd_page);
> > 	unlock_page(pcmd_page);
> > 	// drop pcmd_page ref
> > 	...
> > 	POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED
> > 
> > There's one downside to this: it's _possible_ that an transient
> > get_page() would block POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED.  Then the zeroed page would
> > stick around forever, or at least until the next ELDU operation did
> > another memchr_inv().
> > 
> > I went looking around for some of those and could not find any that I
> > *know* apply to shmem.
> > 
> > This doesn't feel like a great solution; it's more complicated than I
> > would like.  Any other ideas?
> 
> If we could do both truncation and swapping in one side, i.e. in ksgxd,
> that would simplify this process a lot. Then the whole synchronization
> problem would not exist.
> 
> E.g. perhaps #PF handler could just zero PCMD and collect zeroed pages
> indices to a list and ksgxd would truncate them.

I.e. instead of immediate response, go for lazy response that is taken 
care by ksgxd.

BR, Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-07 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28 20:11 [RFC PATCH 0/4] SGX shmem backing store issue Reinette Chatre
2022-04-28 20:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] x86/sgx: Do not free backing memory on ENCLS[ELDU] failure Reinette Chatre
2022-04-28 21:30   ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-28 22:20     ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-28 22:53       ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-28 23:49         ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-03  2:01           ` Kai Huang
2022-05-07 17:25           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-09 17:17             ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-10  0:36               ` Kai Huang
2022-05-11 10:26                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-11 18:29                   ` Haitao Huang
2022-05-11 22:00                     ` Kai Huang
2022-05-12 21:14                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-06 22:09     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-28 20:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/sgx: Set dirty bit after modifying page contents Reinette Chatre
2022-04-28 21:40   ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-28 22:41     ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-06 22:27   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-06 22:40     ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-07 18:01       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-28 20:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/sgx: Obtain backing storage page with enclave mutex held Reinette Chatre
2022-04-28 21:58   ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-28 22:44     ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-06 22:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-28 20:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] x86/sgx: Do not allocate backing pages when loading from backing store Reinette Chatre
2022-04-28 21:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] SGX shmem backing store issue Dave Hansen
2022-04-29 18:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-29 19:45     ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-30  3:22       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-30 15:52         ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-02 14:36         ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-02 17:11           ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-02 21:33             ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-04 22:13               ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-04 22:58                 ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-04 23:36                   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-04 23:50                     ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-05  0:08                       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-04 23:05                 ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-07 17:46               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-07 17:48                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2022-05-09 17:09                   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-10 22:28                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-11 17:23                       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-12 14:10                         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-28 21:29 ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-28 22:20   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-05-04  6:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-05  6:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ynaw2A0z6mBLU0m4@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox