From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Dhanraj, Vijay" <vijay.dhanraj@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SGX selftest `augment_via_eaccept_long`
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 19:09:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvKGxIEpdnawb0bY@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvI6z7wgV2VQtNV7@kernel.org>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 01:45:35PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 06:29:13PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:00:54PM +0000, Dhanraj, Vijay wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 5:18 AM
> > > > To: Dhanraj, Vijay <vijay.dhanraj@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org; Chatre, Reinette
> > > > <reinette.chatre@intel.com>; dave.hansen@linux.intel.com; Huang, Haitao
> > > > <haitao.huang@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SGX selftest `augment_via_eaccept_long`
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:14:56PM -0700, vijay.dhanraj@intel.com wrote:
> > > > > From: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This commit adds a new test case which is same as
> > > > > `augment_via_eaccept` but adds more number of EPC pages to stress test
> > > > `EAUG` via `EACCEPT`.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Hey, to reproduce the original issue: does it reproduce on VM or should I run
> > > > baremetal kernel?
> > > >
> > > > BR, Jarkko
> > >
> > > Hi Jarkko, The issue should be reproducible on baremetal kernel.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I need comment out other tests in order to make sane out of this :-)
>
> Mentioning this because came into realization that stress tests should
> be IMHO moved each to a separate binary (so that they can be run
> separately). Just a note (TODO) to myself.
>
> I'll work on this today again and *possibly* split your test to its own
> application to get a starting point for forementioned.
I got
# RUN enclave.augment_via_eaccept_long ...
# main.c:1241:augment_via_eaccept_long:test enclave: total_size = 8192, seg->size = 8192
# main.c:1241:augment_via_eaccept_long:test enclave: total_size = 12288, seg->size = 4096
# main.c:1241:augment_via_eaccept_long:test enclave: total_size = 36864, seg->size = 24576
# main.c:1241:augment_via_eaccept_long:test enclave: total_size = 40960, seg->size = 4096
# main.c:1259:augment_via_eaccept_long:mmaping pages at end of enclave...
# main.c:1273:augment_via_eaccept_long:Entering enclave to run EACCEPT for each page of 8589934592 bytes may take a while ...
# OK enclave.augment_via_eaccept_long
The CPU used for testing was according to /proc/cpuinfo:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz
I have couple of queries:
1. Is it possible to get dmesg output?
2. Do I have to repeat the test multiple times, or does it
occur unconditionaly?
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-04 20:14 [PATCH] Add SGX selftest `augment_via_eaccept_long` vijay.dhanraj
2022-08-06 18:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-08 12:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-08 13:00 ` Dhanraj, Vijay
2022-08-08 15:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-09 10:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-09 16:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2022-08-09 17:08 ` Dhanraj, Vijay
2022-08-09 18:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-09 18:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-10 0:09 ` Dhanraj, Vijay
2022-08-11 1:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-11 1:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-11 1:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-11 2:01 ` Dhanraj, Vijay
2022-08-12 2:29 ` Haitao Huang
2022-08-12 3:23 ` Dhanraj, Vijay
2022-08-14 18:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-15 16:16 ` Dhanraj, Vijay
2022-08-12 5:47 ` Haitao Huang
2022-08-14 18:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-14 18:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-15 4:58 ` Haitao Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvKGxIEpdnawb0bY@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=vijay.dhanraj@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox