From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
seanjc@google.com, kai.huang@intel.com, fan.du@intel.com,
cathy.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 1/3] x86/sgx: Rename the owner field of struct sgx_epc_page as encl_owner
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 06:27:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ywrgp+NUuB83ajkO@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826160503.1576966-2-zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:05:01AM +0800, Zhiquan Li wrote:
> In order to describe the purpose of 'owner' field more exactly,
> rename the 'owner' field of struct sgx_epc_page as 'encl_owner',
> and update all of references.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
Is this rename really worth of doing? I'd only consider
such if there was two 'owner' fields but since there is
no name collision, why bother?
Thoughts? Please correct me if I've forgot something
essential previously discussed.
BR, Jarkko
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> index 515e2a5f25bb..1315c69a733e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void __sgx_sanitize_pages(struct list_head *dirty_page_list)
>
> static bool sgx_reclaimer_age(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
> {
> - struct sgx_encl_page *page = epc_page->owner;
> + struct sgx_encl_page *page = epc_page->encl_owner;
> struct sgx_encl *encl = page->encl;
> struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm;
> bool ret = true;
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static bool sgx_reclaimer_age(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
>
> static void sgx_reclaimer_block(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
> {
> - struct sgx_encl_page *page = epc_page->owner;
> + struct sgx_encl_page *page = epc_page->encl_owner;
> unsigned long addr = page->desc & PAGE_MASK;
> struct sgx_encl *encl = page->encl;
> int ret;
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void sgx_ipi_cb(void *info)
> static void sgx_encl_ewb(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page,
> struct sgx_backing *backing)
> {
> - struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page = epc_page->owner;
> + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page = epc_page->encl_owner;
> struct sgx_encl *encl = encl_page->encl;
> struct sgx_va_page *va_page;
> unsigned int va_offset;
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void sgx_encl_ewb(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page,
> static void sgx_reclaimer_write(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page,
> struct sgx_backing *backing)
> {
> - struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page = epc_page->owner;
> + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page = epc_page->encl_owner;
> struct sgx_encl *encl = encl_page->encl;
> struct sgx_backing secs_backing;
> int ret;
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static void sgx_reclaim_pages(void)
> epc_page = list_first_entry(&sgx_active_page_list,
> struct sgx_epc_page, list);
> list_del_init(&epc_page->list);
> - encl_page = epc_page->owner;
> + encl_page = epc_page->encl_owner;
>
> if (kref_get_unless_zero(&encl_page->encl->refcount) != 0)
> chunk[cnt++] = epc_page;
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static void sgx_reclaim_pages(void)
>
> for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> epc_page = chunk[i];
> - encl_page = epc_page->owner;
> + encl_page = epc_page->encl_owner;
>
> if (!sgx_reclaimer_age(epc_page))
> goto skip;
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static void sgx_reclaim_pages(void)
> if (!epc_page)
> continue;
>
> - encl_page = epc_page->owner;
> + encl_page = epc_page->encl_owner;
> sgx_reclaimer_write(epc_page, &backing[i]);
>
> kref_put(&encl_page->encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);
> @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ struct sgx_epc_page *sgx_alloc_epc_page(void *owner, bool reclaim)
> for ( ; ; ) {
> page = __sgx_alloc_epc_page();
> if (!IS_ERR(page)) {
> - page->owner = owner;
> + page->encl_owner = owner;
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ void sgx_free_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
>
> spin_lock(&node->lock);
>
> - page->owner = NULL;
> + page->encl_owner = NULL;
> if (page->poison)
> list_add(&page->list, &node->sgx_poison_page_list);
> else
> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static bool __init sgx_setup_epc_section(u64 phys_addr, u64 size,
> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> section->pages[i].section = index;
> section->pages[i].flags = 0;
> - section->pages[i].owner = NULL;
> + section->pages[i].encl_owner = NULL;
> section->pages[i].poison = 0;
> list_add_tail(§ion->pages[i].list, &sgx_dirty_page_list);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> index 0f2020653fba..4d88abccd12e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct sgx_epc_page {
> unsigned int section;
> u16 flags;
> u16 poison;
> - struct sgx_encl_page *owner;
> + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_owner;
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-28 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 16:05 [PATCH RESEND v6 0/3] x86/sgx: fine grained SGX MCA behavior Zhiquan Li
2022-08-26 16:05 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 1/3] x86/sgx: Rename the owner field of struct sgx_epc_page as encl_owner Zhiquan Li
2022-08-28 3:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2022-08-29 1:23 ` Zhiquan Li
2022-08-29 12:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 2:24 ` Zhiquan Li
2022-08-26 16:05 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 2/3] x86/sgx: Introduce union with vepc_vaddr field for virtualization case Zhiquan Li
2022-08-27 21:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-29 1:27 ` Zhiquan Li
2022-08-29 12:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 16:05 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 3/3] x86/sgx: Fine grained SGX MCA behavior for virtualization Zhiquan Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ywrgp+NUuB83ajkO@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cathy.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fan.du@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=zhiquan1.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox