From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3A4ECAAD2 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 22:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235218AbiIAWUJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:20:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48214 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235058AbiIAWTf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:19:35 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43D1A9836A; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDD7B8295F; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 22:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E68B9C433C1; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 22:18:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1662070714; bh=P11/1T5vHWH0SCcpyWwUdgCzRVkbP+ssblCg6//orxA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e4ZXSvTa25bXtQ4JOhN6MHYEzRmAHL5dr5fAFHDNj4qHH4lJzlUVfzJVTrc4sterB v0TbdY23FmZ9U3rsB9+Tffiwq6STUgVrVhzJrTE676a8p5id8KOpvPs0jIF89pkBxI oyCYPAg26t6YDYdpuwBZzd9+yu4WBB0OYqi0bZFK2gGuWz2GecnjEiohWPyVyPGj6j JWmlCKbpIFgVNffPV5RB9mXnGSKpNMRsRY6E499dtKSWkMYfFFlbTe+j9iVm0BprOi 6pnCFt0xqZTRFUctkptNL1rMkSBtxumvRChXOQ/qEZ8iwSfEhh2B1NeocGTTGpQE8r ngQkItbH/r88A== Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 01:18:29 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Dave Hansen Cc: Reinette Chatre , linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Haitao Huang , Vijay Dhanraj , Dave Hansen , Shuah Khan , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] selftests/sgx: retry the ioctls returned with EAGAIN Message-ID: References: <20220830031206.13449-1-jarkko@kernel.org> <20220830031206.13449-6-jarkko@kernel.org> <5d19be91-3aef-5cbe-6063-3ff3dbd5572b@intel.com> <709d9f58-0ae9-833a-ca54-7b50307b377e@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <709d9f58-0ae9-833a-ca54-7b50307b377e@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:14:02AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 8/30/22 19:31, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> On 8/29/2022 8:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >>> From: Haitao Huang > >>> > >>> For EMODT and EREMOVE ioctls with a large range, kernel > >> ioctl()s? > > Ioctl is common enough to be considered as noun and is > > widely phrased like that in commit messages. I don't > > see any added clarity. > > I definitely prefer ioctl(). I can use it. BR, Jarkko