From: "jarkko@kernel.org" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de" <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Dhanraj, Vijay" <vijay.dhanraj@intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"haitao.huang@linux.intel.com" <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/sgx: Do not consider unsanitized pages an error
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 02:58:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxFHKttZMxbbmo5z@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1229a770fd2b4ec6642b921ec4a7e9ed0d11a3b.camel@intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:41:54PM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 01:27 +0300, jarkko@kernel.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 08:42:59PM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 11:35 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > > Jarkko, Kai and Haitao,
> > > >
> > > > Can you three please start trimming your replies? You don't need to and
> > > > should not quote the entirety of your messages every time you reply.
> > > >
> > > > On 8/31/22 11:28, jarkko@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > > > Will it cause racing if we expose dev nodes to user space before
> > > > > > ksgxd is started and sensitization done?
> > > > > I'll to explain this.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the point is to fix the issue at hand, and fix it locally.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changing initialization order is simply out of context. It's
> > > > > not really an argument for or against changing it
> > > > >
> > > > > We are fixing sanitization here, and only that with zero
> > > > > side-effects to any other semantics.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's dictated by the development process [*] but more
> > > > > importantly it's also just plain common sense.
> > > >
> > > > Kai, I think your suggestion is reasonable. You make a good point about
> > > > not needing ksgxd for vepc.
> > > >
> > > > *But*, I think it's a bit too much for a bugfix that's headed to
> > > > -stable. I'm concerned that it will have unintended side effects,
> > > > *especially* when there's a working, tested alternative.
> > >
> > > Agreed. Thanks Dave/Jarkko.
> >
> > Please do a patch. It's a very reasonable suggestion when
> > considered out of context of this bug.
> >
> > If you go really rigid with this, the compilation process
> > should not compile in sanitization process in the case when
> > only vepc is enabled. It's useless functionality in that
> > case.
> >
> > BR, Jarkko
>
> Yeah I am planning to work out one to see how it goes.
Looking forward to try it out :-)
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-30 3:12 [PATCH 0/6] x86/sgx: Test and fixes Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 3:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/sgx: Do not consider unsanitized pages an error Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 22:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-31 1:27 ` Huang, Kai
2022-08-31 2:15 ` jarkko
2022-08-31 2:35 ` Huang, Kai
2022-08-31 2:44 ` jarkko
2022-08-31 2:55 ` Huang, Kai
2022-08-31 2:57 ` jarkko
2022-08-31 3:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 3:28 ` Huang, Kai
2022-08-31 3:40 ` jarkko
2022-08-31 3:17 ` Huang, Kai
2022-08-31 15:18 ` Haitao Huang
2022-08-31 18:28 ` jarkko
2022-08-31 18:35 ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-31 18:44 ` jarkko
2022-08-31 18:45 ` jarkko
2022-08-31 20:42 ` Huang, Kai
2022-09-01 22:27 ` jarkko
2022-09-01 22:41 ` Huang, Kai
2022-09-01 23:58 ` jarkko [this message]
2022-09-02 0:26 ` Huang, Kai
2022-08-31 1:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 1:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 2:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 18:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-30 3:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/sgx: Handle VA page allocation failure for EAUG on PF Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 22:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-30 3:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] selftests/sgx: Ignore OpenSSL 3.0 deprecated functions warning Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 18:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-31 1:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 3:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] selftests/sgx: Add SGX selftest augment_via_eaccept_long Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 22:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-31 2:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 18:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-09-01 22:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-09-01 23:11 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-09-02 0:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-09-02 0:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 3:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/sgx: retry the ioctls returned with EAGAIN Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 22:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-31 2:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 18:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-09-01 22:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 18:14 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-01 22:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 3:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/sgx: Add a bpftrace script for tracking allocation errors Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-30 22:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-31 2:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 18:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-08-31 18:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-31 18:23 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-01 22:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-09-01 22:34 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-01 23:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxFHKttZMxbbmo5z@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vijay.dhanraj@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox