Re: [PATCH 0/3] use vm_flags_t consistently

Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-25T06:49:57Z

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:50:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:25:35 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > ust wondering which tree-branch this series applies ? Tried all the usual
> > ones but could not apply the series cleanly.
> >
> > v6.16-rc3
> > next-20250624
> > mm-stable
> > mm-unstable
>
> It's now in mm-unstable if that helps.

Thanks Andrew!

Just FYI Ashuman - it was applied against the new and shiny (TM) mm-new branch,
maybe we didn't publicise this well enough...

This is the absolute tippy tip of mm development and so may be broken in hideous
ways, but it's what new work should be rebased on.

Then if accepted + stable things trickle to mm-unstable for -next testing (we're
trying to avoid breaking -next too much) and then later mm-stable if all's good
for send ->Linus.

Cheers, Lorenzo