From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian McMenamin Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:16:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC][patch] filesystem: Vmufat filesystem, version 4 Message-Id: <1239693375.6538.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <1239654768.6542.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090413210030.GA14847@linux-sh.org> <1239658604.6542.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090413215949.GD14847@linux-sh.org> <1239692429.6538.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090414070314.GB29075@linux-sh.org> In-Reply-To: <20090414070314.GB29075@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Paul Mundt Cc: linux-fsdevel , LKML , linux-sh , Josef 'Jeff' Sipek , Sam Ravnborg On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 16:03 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > Everything about the on-disk format is tied to the VMU. Until that sinks > in, don't bother sending me email, thanks. No, everything in the file system is dependent on the specification. The specification is not dependent on the hardware. Those are the facts.