From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:25:02 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: sched_clock() clocksource handling. Message-Id: <1243927502.23657.5619.camel@twins> List-Id: References: <20090602071718.GA17710@linux-sh.org> In-Reply-To: <20090602071718.GA17710@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Paul Mundt Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Walker , Linus Walleij , Andrew Victor , Haavard Skinnemoen , Andrew Morton , John Stultz , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:17 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > @@ -362,6 +364,9 @@ static struct clocksource *select_clocksource(void) > if (next = curr_clocksource) > return NULL; > > + if (next->flags & CLOCK_SOURCE_USE_FOR_SCHED_CLOCK) > + sched_clocksource = next; > + > return next; > } > > @@ -440,7 +445,21 @@ void clocksource_unregister(struct clocksource *cs) > list_del(&cs->list); > if (clocksource_override = cs) > clocksource_override = NULL; > + > next_clocksource = select_clocksource(); > + > + /* > + * If select_clocksource() fails to find another suitable > + * clocksource for sched_clocksource and we are unregistering > + * it, switch back to jiffies. > + */ > + if (sched_clocksource = cs) { > + rcu_assign_pointer(sched_clocksource, &clocksource_jiffies); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clocksource_lock, flags); > + synchronize_rcu(); > + return; > + } > + > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clocksource_lock, flags); > } What if there's multiple CLOCK_SOURCE_USER_FOR_SCHED_CLOCK [ damn, thats a long name to type :-) ] ? That is, should we have logic in select_clocksource that does: if ((next->flags & ..) && next->prio > sched_clocksource->prio) or whatever, so that it picks the best one? Same for unregister, should we re-evaluate all clocksources before falling back to basic?