From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@dave
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:35:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311694534-5161-18-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311694534-5161-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
sh doesn't access early_node_map[] directly and enabling
HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is trivial - replacing add_active_range() calls
with memblock_set_node() and selecting HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is
enough.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
---
Paul, memblock now can carry node information itself without relying
on early_node_map[], which makes operations which make use of both
information much saner and generally makes NUMA memory init simpler.
For more details, please read the following thread.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/10354
I couldn't get the cross-compiler from korg to build configuration
with CPU w/ NUMA support but given the trivial nature of the change, I
don't think it would cause build failures on different configs, but
this definitely needs testing on actual NUMA configuration.
The patches implementing HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is currently in
tip:x86/memblock branch on which this patch is based on.
Thanks.
arch/sh/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/sh/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sh/Kconfig b/arch/sh/Kconfig
index bbdeb48..8c10d85 100644
--- a/arch/sh/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sh/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config SUPERH
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
select HAVE_IDE if HAS_IOPORT
select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
+ select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
select HAVE_OPROFILE
select HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT
select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/setup.c b/arch/sh/kernel/setup.c
index 58bff45..e3942ca 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/setup.c
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ void __init __add_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
pmb_bolt_mapping((unsigned long)__va(start), start, end - start,
PAGE_KERNEL);
- add_active_range(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn);
+ memblock_set_node(PFN_PHYS(start_pfn),
+ PFN_PHYS(end_pfn - start_pfn), nid);
}
void __init __weak plat_early_device_setup(void)
--
1.7.6
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1311694534-5161-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
[not found] <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311694534-5161-18-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@dave \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox