From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick Titiano <ptitiano@baylibre.com>,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com,
eduardo.valentin@ti.com, bcousson@baylibre.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: minor fixes
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:51:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393858290.2193.28.camel@rzhang1-mobl4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fvn0xioy.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 15:52 -0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Here are 2 minor updates to the rcar-thermal driver.
> >
> > First patch removes an unecessary mask applied in a if statement.
> > Because the same mask was already applied in the preceding statement,
> > the second one can be removed.
> >
> > Second patch avoids updating the thermal zone in case an IRQ was triggered but
> > the temperature didn't effectively change.
> > Note this is not a driver issue.
> > Below is a captured debug trace illustrating the purpose of this patch:
> > out of 8 thermal zone updates, only 2 are actually necessary.
> >
> > [ 41.120000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp%000
> > [ 41.120000] rcar_thermal_work(): new_ctemp0000
> > [ 41.120000] rcar_thermal_work(): temp is now 30000C, update thermal zone
> > [ 58.990000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
> > [ 58.990000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
> > [ 58.990000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
> > [ 59.290000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
> > [ 59.290000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
> > [ 59.290000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
> > [ 59.590000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
> > [ 59.590000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
> > [ 59.590000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
> > [ 59.890000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
> > [ 59.890000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
> > [ 59.890000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
> > [ 60.190000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
> > [ 60.190000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
> > [ 60.190000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
> > [ 60.490000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
> > [ 60.490000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
> > [ 60.490000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
> > [ 60.790000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
> > [ 60.790000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp5000
> > [ 60.790000] rcar_thermal_work(): temp is now 35000C, update thermal zone
> >
> > I suspect this may be due to sensor sampling accuracy / fluctuation,
> > but no formal proof.
> >
> > Patrick Titiano (2):
> > thermal: rcar-thermal: fix same mask applied twice
> > thermal: rcar-thermal: update thermal zone only when temperature
> > changes
> >
> > drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> For all patches
>
> Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
>
applied.
thanks,
rui
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 13:10 [PATCH 0/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: minor fixes Patrick Titiano
2014-02-28 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: fix same mask applied twice Patrick Titiano
2014-02-28 13:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: update thermal zone only when temperature changes Patrick Titiano
2014-03-02 23:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: minor fixes Kuninori Morimoto
2014-03-03 14:51 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2014-03-05 14:45 ` Patrick Titiano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1393858290.2193.28.camel@rzhang1-mobl4 \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=ptitiano@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).