From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:29:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: add clock-indices support Message-Id: <1400141.lU4VofDlLi@avalon> List-Id: References: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 23 February 2014 15:46:04 Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2014-02-23 14:40:46) > > On Sunday 23 February 2014 13:00:24 Mike Turquette wrote: > > > Quoting Ben Dooks (2014-02-13 10:02:49) > > > > > > > Add a property called clock-indices to allow clock-output-names > > > > to be used where the index used to lookup a clock is not a 1:1 > > > > mapping to the array position in the clock-output-names > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > > > > > > Ben & Laurent, > > > > > > The clock-indices stuff looks sane to me. I've taken Ben's patch #1 into > > > clk-next. It seems patch #3 might be dropped and patch #2 didn't apply > > > cleanly for me. > > > > > > Can Laurent's patches and Ben's #2 be rebased and sent together as a PR? > > > > Sure. I've pushed my pending patches to > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git clocks/next/drivers > > > > Ben, could you please rebase your patch on top of it and repost ? I'll > > then send a pull request to Mike. > > FYI, I've just pushed a new clk-next branch based on -rc3 out to my > linaro remote. You don't need to rebase but it's there if you want to > put your stuff on top of the latest. Thanks. Rebased and pushed. > > > I'll leave it up to you guys to figure out the backwards compatibility > > > issue with Ben's patch #3. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart