From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 08:08:08 +0000 Subject: Re: R-CAR's arch Message-Id: <1400832488.4451.1.camel@chaos.site> List-Id: References: <20140522101938.51fec16f@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20140522101938.51fec16f@endymion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi Simon, Le Friday 23 May 2014 à 09:37 +0900, Simon Horman a écrit : > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:55:07AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 22 May 2014 10:19:38 Jean Delvare wrote: > > > I admit I don't really understand how SHMOBILE relates to ARM and > > > SUPERH (which so far I thought were two different and totally > > > independent architectures, but apparently I was wrong?) > > > > CONFIG_SUPERH is defined for arch/sh only, and CONFIG_ARCH_SHMOBILE for > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile. > > For Jean's benefit: > > SUPERH is an architecture. > SHMOBILE is the in-kernel name for ARM based SoCs from Renesas. > > Some IP blocks are shared between both. > Or more to the point SHMOBILE makes use of some (e.g. driver) > code that was originally developed for use with SUPERH. OK, I thought it was something like that, thanks for the confirmation. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support