From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/11] i2c: rcar: tackle race conditions in the driver
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:56:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447948611-2615-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> (raw)
Hello RCar Fans!
So, here is V3 of this series. After a debugging session with Laurent, we
finally fixed his issue for good. It was not board dependent as we thought, but
toolchain dependent! Hidden by a macro, the driver used a compound assignemt
with a function call as the rvalue. After patch 6, this function also changed the
flags which were to be changed by the compound assignment. Basically (after macro):
priv->flags |= i_change_priv_flags(priv);
Which is undefined behaviour, I guess. However, after my refactoring, the
called functions always returned 0, so we can simply do:
i_change_priv_flags(priv);
Nasty one, but finally issue gone, for all toolchains and optimization settings.
Furthermore, patch 11 has been added because HW engineers wanted it.
The branch can be found here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git renesas/rcar-i2c-rework-v3
Please test, test, test :)
Wolfram
Changes since V2:
* patch 6/11 was cleaned up to not use the compund assignment
* patch 11/11 introduced as requested by HW engineers
Changes since V1:
* new patch 1/10 to ensure clock is always on
* rebased patch 2/10 to the new patch
* some patch descriptions slightly reworded
Here is the description of the V1 series for those who missed it:
Two issues people have seen with the i2c-rcar driver was:
a) immediately restarted messages after NACK from client
b) duplicated data bytes in messages
Some people already worked on those and had a tough time because it was hard to
reproduce these issues on non-customer setup. Luckily, I somewhen had a state
where the first transfer after boot would always show the above issues on a
plain Renesas Lager board. When measuring, I found a third issue thanks to my
new tool 'i2ctransfer' (and thanks to projects like sigrok and OpenLogicSniffer,
of course. Thank you very much!):
c) after read message, no repeated start was sent, but stop + start.
Due to some unlucky design choices in the IP core, it has some race windows
which can cause problems if interrupts get delayed. Also, for every new message
in one transfer, context switches between interrupt and process were needed.
So I refactored the driver to setup new messages in interrupt context, too.
This avoids the race for b) because we are now setting up the new message
before we release the i2c bus clock (before we released the clock and set up
the message in process context). c) is also fixed, this was not a race but a
bug in the state handling. a) however is not fixed 100% :( We have the race
window as small as possible now when utilizing interrupts, so it is an
improvement and worked for my test cases well. There were experiments by me and
Renesas engineers to use polling to prevent the issue but this caused other
side effects, sadly. So, let's improve the situation now and let's see where we
get.
I did quite some lab testing here and also verified that slave support does not
suffer from these changes. However, I'd really appreciate if people could give
this real-world-testing which is always different.
Please have a look, a test, etc...
Thanks,
Wolfram
Wolfram Sang (11):
i2c: rcar: make sure clocks are on when doing clock calculation
i2c: rcar: rework hw init
i2c: rcar: remove unused IOERROR state
i2c: rcar: remove spinlock
i2c: rcar: refactor setup of a msg
i2c: rcar: init new messages in irq
i2c: rcar: don't issue stop when HW does it automatically
i2c: rcar: check master irqs before slave irqs
i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
i2c: rcar: clean up after refactoring
i2c: rcar: handle difference in setting up non-first message
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 249 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-19 15:56 Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] i2c: rcar: make sure clocks are on when doing clock calculation Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] i2c: rcar: rework hw init Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] i2c: rcar: remove unused IOERROR state Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] i2c: rcar: remove spinlock Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] i2c: rcar: refactor setup of a msg Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] i2c: rcar: init new messages in irq Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] i2c: rcar: don't issue stop when HW does it automatically Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] i2c: rcar: check master irqs before slave irqs Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early Wolfram Sang
2016-03-31 21:02 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-03-31 22:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-01 19:55 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-01 20:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-01 23:05 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-02 7:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-02 12:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-03 8:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 13:35 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-03 13:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] i2c: rcar: clean up after refactoring Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] i2c: rcar: handle difference in setting up non-first message Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] i2c: rcar: tackle race conditions in the driver Laurent Pinchart
2015-11-30 13:27 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447948611-2615-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).