From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:37:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: add clock-indices support Message-Id: <1475285.BYNkMv7rrx@avalon> List-Id: References: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On Sunday 02 March 2014 22:28:09 Ben Dooks wrote: > On 23/02/14 21:00, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Ben Dooks (2014-02-13 10:02:49) > > > >> Add a property called clock-indices to allow clock-output-names > >> to be used where the index used to lookup a clock is not a 1:1 > >> mapping to the array position in the clock-output-names > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > > > > Ben & Laurent, > > > > The clock-indices stuff looks sane to me. I've taken Ben's patch #1 into > > clk-next. It seems patch #3 might be dropped and patch #2 didn't apply > > cleanly for me. > > > > Can Laurent's patches and Ben's #2 be rebased and sent together as a PR? > > I'll leave it up to you guys to figure out the backwards compatibility > > issue with Ben's patch #3. > > Thanks, I've only just found this in my mailbox. > Is there still any actions I need to take? I've sent a pull request for my patches only. Could you please rebase yours ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart