From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:18:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn Message-Id: <1487870304.14159.29.camel@perches.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rob Herring Cc: "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux , Alexander Shishkin , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Linux-ALSA , dri-devel , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-media@vger.k On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older > > pr_warning in the kernel source tree. > > > > Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. > > > > This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate > > define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is > > not used in tools/. > > > > Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing. [] > Where's the removal of pr_warning so we don't have more sneak in? After all of these actually get applied, and maybe a cycle or two later, one would get sent.