From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:24:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/81] SH pin control and GPIO rework Message-Id: <1586031.1BSJIX9nKm@avalon> List-Id: References: <1355611915-25060-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <1355611915-25060-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:31:00 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > I would like to push this set to v3.9 independently of the later rework > > and OF-related sets. Linus and Simon, which tree would you like me to push > > this through ? > > The pinctrl or sh tree obviously :-) > > Basically if you believe there will be colissions with other stuff in > the sh tree it should go in through that tree. Obviously there is little > risk of collissions in the pinctrl tree as this is a new driver. I believe the risk of collisions in the SH and ARM trees are higher than in the pinctrl tree, so it would probably better to push the patches through Simon. > You can add my Acked-by: to the entire patch set, since the result at > the end is super-nice. Thank you. I'll push a public branch on top of v3.8-rc1 when it will be released, and will send a pull request a couple of weeks later. > I think there were review comments of mine that were not fixed yet, > but I trust you to go through that and fix it up as time goes by. They will be addressed by new patch series. This one is already pretty big, I didn't want to delay it anymore. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart