From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:20:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 07/17] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779: Sort headers alphabetically Message-Id: <1615505.ZFJ3Lvc46h@avalon> List-Id: References: <1385451139-29686-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <52946AEA.2010500@cogentembedded.com> <20131127050958.GE27704@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20131127050958.GE27704@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Simon, On Wednesday 27 November 2013 14:09:58 Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:33:30PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > On 26-11-2013 11:32, Simon Horman wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > >--- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c > > >b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c index 4f9e3ec..e202c64 100644 > > >--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c > > >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c > > >@@ -19,35 +19,35 @@ > > > * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA > > > 02110-1301 USA */ > > > > > >-#include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > > #include > > > #include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > > #include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > > #include > > >-#include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > >+#include > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > >-#include > > > #include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > >+#include > > > #include > > > #include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > >-#include > > >+#include > > >+#include > > > > > I thought it was a good idea to keep the #include's in the order > > > > of the most generic to most machine specific ones: > > first, then , then , only with empty lines > > between groups (which weren't used here) with each group kept > > sorted... > > That sounds reasonable to me. > Laurent, do you have an opinion on this? That's fine with me. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart