From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:41:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1620453.50bv9Xb5nl@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394823605-31883-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Hi Ben,
On Monday 17 March 2014 13:36:33 Ben Dooks wrote:
[snip]
> From pm_runtime.h:
>
> static inline int pm_runtime_get_sync(struct device *dev)
> {
> return __pm_runtime_resume(dev, RPM_GET_PUT);
> }
>
> static inline int pm_request_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> return __pm_runtime_resume(dev, RPM_ASYNC);
> }
>
> So it looks like pm_runtime_resume() does not protect against the
> possibility that something else may re-suspend the device.
Correct.
> I have yet to ascertain how this ends up happening with device probe, it
> seems to be very dependant on the code.
We might be doing something wrong in the driver from a runtime PM point of
view that leads to the device being suspended. I'd like to catch that instead
of hiding it by a pm_runtime_get_sync() call. If it turns out that we're not
doing anything wrong then replacing pm_runtime_resume() with
pm_runtime_get_sync() would of course be fine.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-17 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-14 19:00 [PATCH] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init Ben Dooks
2014-03-14 19:01 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-14 19:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-14 19:19 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-14 21:13 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-15 11:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-17 9:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-17 9:41 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 11:20 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 11:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-17 11:37 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 13:01 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-17 13:07 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 20:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-17 21:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-17 21:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-17 22:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-17 11:40 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 11:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-17 12:56 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 13:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-17 13:36 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 13:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-17 13:41 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-03-17 13:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-17 13:44 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 13:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-17 14:01 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-17 14:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-17 14:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-18 20:17 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-18 20:45 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-18 21:48 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-19 8:19 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-19 10:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1620453.50bv9Xb5nl@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).