From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:01:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC 01/10] drm: ADV7511 i2c HDMI encoder driver Message-Id: <1867305.sTJDNiZ7SL@avalon> List-Id: References: <1377866264-21110-2-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1377866264-21110-2-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi Lars-Peter, On Monday 02 September 2013 16:43:25 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 09/02/2013 04:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 02 September 2013 15:40:22 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >> On 09/02/2013 03:18 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Friday 30 August 2013 14:37:35 Ulrich Hecht wrote: > >>>> ADV7511 driver snapshot taken from commit f416e32 of xcomm_zynq_3_10 > >>>> branch at https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/linux.git > >>> > >>> I believe Lars-Peter (CC'ed) was planning to upstream the driver. > >>> Lars-Peter, could you please share your plans ? > >> > >> My plan was to have all this upstream long time ago ;) > >> > >> As I said in that other thread, I don't think it is a good idea to have > >> two drivers for the same device. But if nobody else sees a problem with > >> this and as long as the v4l driver doesn't have devicetree support I > >> guess we could get away with it for now. Even if it will probably haunt > >> us later on. > >> > >> There are still a few minor bits and pieces to iron out, but lets try to > >> aim for 2.6.13. > > > > If you can make it for 2.6.13 I will be extremely impressed :-) > > Yea, I know DRM always takes a bit longer... I think you meant 3.13 ;-) > > Do you plan to push the driver yourself ? If so, I would appreciate if you > > could CC me. If there's just a few minor bits to iron out I can already > > review your latest version if that can help. > > There are a couple of style issues, so if you review the driver ignore these > for now, but otherwise feedback is welcome, thanks. And I'm not also quite > happy with the ASoC integration yet. Sure. Is the version available from the above branch the latest version ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart