linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned data"
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:09:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e77ade4fb1d924ffaf226cb946ba3314ba59a1d.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb8d3d2a-b843-49d5-a219-10a29b5877d0@roeck-us.net>

On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 07:06 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:34:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 3/25/24 00:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > Hi Guenter,
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 16:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > This reverts commit cadc4e1a2b4d20d0cc0e81f2c6ba0588775e54e5.
> > > > 
> > > > Commit cadc4e1a2b4d ("sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned
> > > > data") causes bad checksum calculations on unaligned data. Reverting
> > > > it fixes the problem.
> > > > 
> > > >      # Subtest: checksum
> > > >      # module: checksum_kunit
> > > >      1..5
> > > >      # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:500
> > > >      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
> > > >          ( u64)result == 53378 (0xd082)
> > > >          ( u64)expec == 33488 (0x82d0)
> > > >      # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      not ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
> > > >      # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:525
> > > >      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
> > > >          ( u64)result == 65281 (0xff01)
> > > >          ( u64)expec == 65280 (0xff00)
> > > >      # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      not ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
> > > >      # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:573
> > > >      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
> > > >          ( u64)result == 65535 (0xffff)
> > > >          ( u64)expec == 65534 (0xfffe)
> > > >      # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      not ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs
> > > >      # test_ip_fast_csum: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
> > > >      # test_csum_ipv6_magic: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
> > > >   # checksum: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
> > > >   # Totals: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
> > > > not ok 22 checksum
> > > 
> > > Can you tell me how the tests are run so I can try to verify this on real hardware?
> > > 
> > 
> > Enabling CONFIG_KUNIT and CHECKSUM_KUNIT and booting with those tests enabled
> > should do it.
> > 
> 
> Did you have time to test this on real hardware ?

Not yet. I just returned from Easter holidays and need to get synced with work first.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-24 23:18 [PATCH] Revert "sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned data" Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25  7:39 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-03-25 14:34   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-02 14:06     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-02 14:09       ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [this message]
2024-05-01  8:28         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-01 14:44           ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-01 14:49             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-02  7:21           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-05-02  7:23             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-03-25 15:35   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-02 10:28 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e77ade4fb1d924ffaf226cb946ba3314ba59a1d.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --to=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).