From: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [DREAMCAST] : Buildfailure
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:40:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071229004013.9a05bbd6.Kristoffer.Ericson@Gmail.com> (raw)
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:55:16 +0900
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:17:13PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:44:54 +0100
> > Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > It was possible to confirm it even in my environment.
> > > > The problem occurs when it is gcc-3.4.
> > >
> > > Is this a bug in GCC or is it more of a design thing?
> >
> > I do not understand in which there is a cause.
> > If I have time, I want to examine it.
>
> There were a few inconsistencies, and also a const mismatch in the
> get_user() case. This fixes those up, and makes the get/put_user
> interfaces a bit more consistent, with more reliable type checking.
>
> See if this fixes things for you, seems to do the trick with my gcc-3.x
> and gcc-4.x compilers.
Builds nicely now, thanks.
>
> ---
>
> include/asm-sh/uaccess_32.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-sh/uaccess_32.h b/include/asm-sh/uaccess_32.h
> index 59a9f20..50b2f0b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-sh/uaccess_32.h
> +++ b/include/asm-sh/uaccess_32.h
> @@ -95,11 +95,9 @@ static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>
> -static inline int access_ok(int type, const void __user *p, unsigned long size)
> -{
> - unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)p;
> - return __access_ok(addr, size);
> -}
> +#define access_ok(type, addr, size) \
> + (__chk_user_ptr(addr), \
> + __access_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), (size)))
>
> /*
> * Uh, these should become the main single-value transfer routines ...
> @@ -113,18 +111,16 @@ static inline int access_ok(int type, const void __user *p, unsigned long size)
> * (a) re-use the arguments for side effects (sizeof is ok)
> * (b) require any knowledge of processes at this stage
> */
> -#define put_user(x,ptr) __put_user_check((x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)))
> -#define get_user(x,ptr) __get_user_check((x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)))
> +#define put_user(x,ptr) __put_user_check((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
> +#define get_user(x,ptr) __get_user_check((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
>
> /*
> * The "__xxx" versions do not do address space checking, useful when
> * doing multiple accesses to the same area (the user has to do the
> * checks by hand with "access_ok()")
> */
> -#define __put_user(x,ptr) \
> - __put_user_nocheck((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)))
> -#define __get_user(x,ptr) \
> - __get_user_nocheck((x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)))
> +#define __put_user(x,ptr) __put_user_nocheck((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
> +#define __get_user(x,ptr) __get_user_nocheck((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
>
> struct __large_struct { unsigned long buf[100]; };
> #define __m(x) (*(struct __large_struct __user *)(x))
> @@ -132,7 +128,6 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long buf[100]; };
> #define __get_user_size(x,ptr,size,retval) \
> do { \
> retval = 0; \
> - __chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
> switch (size) { \
> case 1: \
> __get_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "b"); \
> @@ -151,24 +146,22 @@ do { \
>
> #define __get_user_nocheck(x,ptr,size) \
> ({ \
> - long __gu_err, __gu_val; \
> - __typeof__(*(ptr)) *__pu_addr = (ptr); \
> - __get_user_size(__gu_val, (__pu_addr), (size), __gu_err); \
> + long __gu_err; \
> + unsigned long __gu_val; \
> + const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr); \
> + __chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
> + __get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err); \
> (x) = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
> __gu_err; \
> })
>
> #define __get_user_check(x,ptr,size) \
> ({ \
> - long __gu_err, __gu_val; \
> - __typeof__(*(ptr)) *__pu_addr = (ptr); \
> - __chk_user_ptr(__pu_addr); \
> - if (likely(__addr_ok((unsigned long)(__pu_addr)))) { \
> - __get_user_size(__gu_val, (__pu_addr), (size), __gu_err);\
> - } else { \
> - __gu_err = -EFAULT; \
> - __gu_val = 0; \
> - } \
> + long __gu_err = -EFAULT; \
> + unsigned long __gu_val = 0; \
> + const __typeof__(*(ptr)) *__gu_addr = (ptr); \
> + if (likely(access_ok(VERIFY_READ, __gu_addr, (size)))) \
> + __get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err); \
> (x) = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
> __gu_err; \
> })
> @@ -199,7 +192,6 @@ extern void __get_user_unknown(void);
> #define __put_user_size(x,ptr,size,retval) \
> do { \
> retval = 0; \
> - __chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
> switch (size) { \
> case 1: \
> __put_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "b"); \
> @@ -218,22 +210,22 @@ do { \
> } \
> } while (0)
>
> -#define __put_user_nocheck(x,ptr,size) \
> -({ \
> - long __pu_err; \
> - __put_user_size((x),(ptr),(size),__pu_err); \
> - __pu_err; \
> +#define __put_user_nocheck(x,ptr,size) \
> +({ \
> + long __pu_err; \
> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr); \
> + __chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
> + __put_user_size((x), __pu_addr, (size), __pu_err); \
> + __pu_err; \
> })
>
> #define __put_user_check(x,ptr,size) \
> ({ \
> - long __pu_err; \
> + long __pu_err = -EFAULT; \
> __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr); \
> - \
> - if (likely(__addr_ok((unsigned long)__pu_addr))) \
> - __put_user_size((x),__pu_addr,(size),__pu_err); \
> - else \
> - __pu_err = -EFAULT; \
> + if (likely(access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, __pu_addr, size))) \
> + __put_user_size((x), __pu_addr, (size), \
> + __pu_err); \
> __pu_err; \
> })
>
--
Kristoffer Ericson <Kristoffer.Ericson@Gmail.com>
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-28 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 23:40 Kristoffer Ericson [this message]
2007-12-30 3:06 ` [DREAMCAST] : Buildfailure Paul Mundt
2007-12-31 17:34 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071229004013.9a05bbd6.Kristoffer.Ericson@Gmail.com \
--to=kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox