From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:14:12 +0000 Subject: Re: set_dma_addr missing ? Message-Id: <20080128141412.GA9340@linux-sh.org> List-Id: References: <38b2ab8a0801261302i68a84fdo6d6ebdb26d9acfc8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <38b2ab8a0801261302i68a84fdo6d6ebdb26d9acfc8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:50:31PM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 11:17 AM, Paul Mundt wrote: > > That's the plan, yes. DMABRG will probably need some special handling, > > but that's pretty isolated. The ST40 DMACs will also prove to be a source > > of irritation, so it's still going to take some iterations before > > everything is happily migrated > > Sorry to be blind again but I can't find the current DMAC for the ST40... > Not merged yet. Sitting in a pile with the rest of the ST40 patches at the moment.