Re: set_dma_addr missing ?

Stuart MENEFY
2008-01-28T14:00:55Z

Francis

Francis Moreau wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 11:17 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
>> That's the plan, yes. DMABRG will probably need some special handling,
>> but that's pretty isolated. The ST40 DMACs will also prove to be a source
>> of irritation, so it's still going to take some iterations before
>> everything is happily migrated
>
> Sorry to be blind again but I can't find the current DMAC for the ST40...

I don't think there is much (if any) of it in the kernel.org trees
at the moment, have a look at the latest source release:
http://stlinux.com/pub/stlinux/2.3/updates/RPMS/host/stlinux23-host-kernel-source-sh4-2.6.23.13_stm23_0106-106.noarch.rpm

The FDMA stuff is all in drivers/stm (as in theory it should be shared
between a couple of architectures, in practice it isn't yet).

And yes, I know it is in need of a good clean up, sounds like moving
to the dmaengine API would be a good opportunity!

Stuart