From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SH-Sci(f) driver as console
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:51:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080131105111.GA15324@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201776250.20171.72.camel@Atlas>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:44:10AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> I'm having problems with the sh-sci driver as a console.
>
> The early printk code works for my board; I added the register
> definitions into the sh-sci.h file.
>
> However, When it comes to register_console for the ttySC - at that
> point, the uart's havent been registered, so the console doesn't attach,
> failing at the line :
>
>
> static int __init serial_console_setup(struct console *co, char
> *options)
> {
> .
> .
> .
> /*
> * Also need to check port->type, we don't actually have any
> * UPIO_PORT ports, but uart_report_port() handily misreports
> * it anyways if we don't have a port available by the time this is
> * called.
> */
>
> if (!port->type)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> .
> .
> .
> }
>
> only later does uart_register_driver get called when static int __init
> sci_init(void) runs.
>
> Do I need to change something to make the call to sci_init occur earlier
> in the kernel ? or should I just call register console again later on
> perhaps?
>
The uart and console driver are fairly orthogonal. While the port
defs overlap, one does not intrinsically depend on the other.
early_sci_setup() is provided for the cases where we want to set the port
up early, but should probably be adjusted for a different pointer type.
Perhaps the easiest thing to do is to take the early printk uart info and
pass that in to early_sci_setup(), since we know we'll at least have
something we can use early there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-31 10:44 SH-Sci(f) driver as console Kieran Bingham
2008-01-31 10:51 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2008-01-31 10:52 ` Paul Mundt
2008-01-31 18:09 ` Kieran Bingham
2008-01-31 23:57 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080131105111.GA15324@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox