From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:45:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SH/Dreamcast - joystick (Control pad) Message-Id: <200802111145.34150.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nextPart2296998.8IDTDY167H" List-Id: References: <1202684222.6237.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080211112433.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> <23228.85.118.17.158.1202747372.squirrel@newgolddream.dyndns.info> In-Reply-To: <23228.85.118.17.158.1202747372.squirrel@newgolddream.dyndns.info> To: Adrian McMenamin Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Paul Mundt , linux-sh , LKML --nextPart2296998.8IDTDY167H Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 11 February 2008, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > On Mon, February 11, 2008 4:25 pm, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:19:22AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Monday 11 February 2008, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > >> > On Mon, February 11, 2008 12:22 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > > no remove function ? looks like the probe() forces a connect, but > >> > > there's no remove() to force a disconnect ... > >> > > >> > Removing these devices (or any other plugged directly into the maple > >> > ports) is a quick way to destroy your Dreamcast: hence they were nev= er > >> > implemented I guess. But there is no convincing reason for the > >> > >> software > >> > >> > not doing so, I suppose. I can just put in comments about it. > >> > >> and not allow the driver to be built as a module until the comments > >> become code ... > > > > Normally drivers can be unbound from devices via sysfs even if they are > > built-in, not modules. > > I meant comments about not being so silly as to start plugging maple > devices in and out of the ports on the DC. I understand the point about > the code and will rework appropriately. is that a maple bus limitation or a joystick issue ? if maple, then there= =20 really isnt much holding back this driver ... > All I wanted to do is take somebody's old code and get it to work on 2.6. > But nothing is that simple :-/ better than nothing. if someone doesnt like the lack of functionality, the= y=20 know where the source is ;) =2Dmike --nextPart2296998.8IDTDY167H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAR7B7rkFjO5/oN/WBAQJMjhAAlxepu9dlh5aZUEDvPr5u6kh+OcSEvSYx Nj3IDkX5CtYE8x3arDHtYqxwVoLgNmrcqsvvuPmwA3EuY8NXSJb/VBZzK2p89LVp 8hRBUzV4LZLFGRqpp/bggOpjZVngucWmVnAix+3vWpaZFm7JdQsKhfq3NZP7Ezxn uTWEUdYojTgUUA0bqBSUBGFsUlE2bjPtVuQB9xCWVmyFW93jJPxm7mKh6fk0kvhd bSUqD20QtbUBxuwht35zY3Bw+AACJa7nEd8dCzdGMLy1GBp1/N09J4ESJjO4Wb0w OyIJZb9N1KEtrJ/QnZ6/LdeGhyq6dHsPrpna9X7AUNK2wfgNT27/lBrzsWz81doW 7rEB7+TeJIlf0+mREkV2bYd4xurUktfHfW+AezySKh7uBaFbD7ZBdrbKpkNVrpTe VV9/c3nelMBH8RC87KBMb8IOEqKAhuNVa0XCXHLtQmqXGzrYfemvI3urR6r3B4mB F4eXds6JQS1ZGOhUJS14afYYRQTd1Es2MWo/wgRIVlOePgvzGQtcJqq6YYSA7nyy u8NCSnh6MOG/a28FZNR0oSJ+y54asm+qLuqUIFqDOBl1fF0JSKbYlwGVgsivx/Mq vUKDvuRJs5UEkxodkRU2FE6KEJYpUBMUjs+7ObnqLJaDUqw59U1WNpRFgUZgbl3D l0Aa9c8g8hU= =Sv4A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2296998.8IDTDY167H--