SH devices in "the wild"

SH devices in "the wild"

[Adrian McMenamin]

Are there any easily acquirable SH devices out in the wild where useful
hacking might be done?

I'm not giving up on the Dreamcast, but variety would be interesting
once in a while.

Re: SH devices in "the wild"

[Paul Mundt]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:57:40AM +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> Are there any easily acquirable SH devices out in the wild where useful
> hacking might be done?
> 
Yes.

Re: SH devices in "the wild"

[Kristoffer Ericson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]

On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:57:40 +0000
Adrian McMenamin <adrian@newgolddream.dyndns.info> wrote:

> Are there any easily acquirable SH devices out in the wild where useful
> hacking might be done?
> 
> I'm not giving up on the Dreamcast, but variety would be interesting
> once in a while.

I think alot of them are listed on the linuxSH wiki.

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: SH devices in "the wild"

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 465 bytes --]

On Monday 26 January 2009 19:57:40 Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> Are there any easily acquirable SH devices out in the wild where useful
> hacking might be done?
>
> I'm not giving up on the Dreamcast, but variety would be interesting
> once in a while.

ive found the lantank to be pretty good (it's in the wiki).  it has USB, 
ethernet, an IDE bus, and 200mhz/64meg RAM.

C++ and -pipe is the only annoying thing as that tends to eat up the RAM :/.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]