From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Error in copy_process, when enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING.
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 04:11:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090518041155.GA18919@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29ab51dc0905112140v3187b462qcc8a9e5385de8ef6@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:15:22PM +0100, Stuart MENEFY wrote:
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > Error in copy_process, when enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING.
> > This error has p->hardirqs_enabled in kernel.fork.c
> >
> > 987 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> > 988 DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->hardirqs_enabled);
> > 989 DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->softirqs_enabled);
> > 990 #endif
> > 991 retval = -EAGAIN;
> >
> > The error message is as follows.
> > I am debuging this. Please teach if you know the revision method of
> > this problem.
>
> As it happens I was looking at this recently. I think there are some
> missing calls to trace_hardirqs_on/off in the assembly
> code. Unfortunately my kernel is quite different from the mainline in
> this area, but you could try this patch which is an *untested* forward
> port of the code I'm currently running successfully.
>
This deadlocks for me with PROVE_LOCKING enabled, though it is certainly
an improvement over what we had before. I'll try and debug it a bit more
over the next few days when I get some spare cycles. If you have your
kernel source available somewhere it would certainly make comparing the
differences easier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 4:40 [BUG] Error in copy_process, when enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2009-05-12 12:15 ` Stuart MENEFY
2009-05-18 4:11 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-05-18 17:18 ` Stuart MENEFY
2009-07-29 14:11 ` Paul Mundt
2009-08-19 6:35 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2009-09-04 8:15 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090518041155.GA18919@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox