Re: [PATCH 1/2] SH: add support for the RJ54N1CB0C camera for the kfr2r09 platform

[Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>]

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:20:48PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c |  139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > This seems to depend on the RJ54N1CB0C driver, so I'll queue this up
> > after that has been merged in the v4l tree. If it's available on a topic
> > branch upstream that isn't going to be rebased, then I can pull that in,
> > but this is not so critical either way.
> 
> It actually shouldn't depend on the driver patch. The driver has no 
> headers, so... I haven't verified, but it should work either way. OTOH, 
> waiting for the driver patch is certainly a safe bet:-)
> 
I thought it had a header dependency, but I must have been imagining
things. So in that regard it looks fine, I'll split out my 2.6.32 stuff
in to a separate branch momentarily and then roll this in when I start
taking 2.6.33 stuff. This should at least allow us to start testing in
-next when the driver is merged.