From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 09:54:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: fix the id of scif in SH7757 Message-Id: <20100507095437.GF14009@linux-sh.org> List-Id: References: <4BE3DB0C.3020006@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <4BE3DB0C.3020006@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:50:48PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:19:08PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > >> Because the value of CONFIG_SERIAL_SH_SCI_NR_UARTS is 3. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > > > > If there are only 3 devices, then why do we have them named scif2, scif3, > > and scif4? Presumably there used to be a scif0 and scif1? > > Yes, this cpu also has scif0 and scif1. > But those scif is only named "SCIF0" and "SCIF1". > Actually those functions are 16550 based serial port. > If the 16550 based UARTs have been named SCIF0 and SCIF1 that really doesn't bode well for the rest of the CPU.. I'll apply it, thanks for the clarification.